This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Portia327 (talk | contribs) at 18:33, 12 April 2009 (→Reconsideration: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:33, 12 April 2009 by Portia327 (talk | contribs) (→Reconsideration: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Please feel free to leave a new message. To do so, please click here - I will respond on your talk page as necessary :)-Fastily
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
The edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/Gaspar_Yanga is intended to update the reference url that is no longer accessible and thus is not of much use to a would be reader. An archived version of the original url was provided as a result. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikesoft (talk • contribs) 21:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I've re-added the archived url of the original article, the original url does show that it was permanently shutdown on Oct. 31, 2008 as seen here: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikesoft (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Twilight the musical.jpg
I removed the F7 speedy tag, as the image appears to be a logo, was tagged as such. Disputed fair use {{dfu}} could be used if the FuR is disputed, or send it to Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Thanks Skier Dude (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
RFA thanks
| My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |  |
Vandalism?
I noticed that you reverted this edit and called it vandalism on the user's page. I think that this information was at least added in good faith, and perhaps something that should have stayed in the article. it may have been a bit poorly worded, but I don't think the intent was malicious. KJS77 02:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
attempted de-orphaning
So in what way was the attempt at de-orphaning Galactic Odyssey unconstructive? I looked through the wiki pages that were candidates, I googled the book and tried to find other leads, I tried searching for pages mentioning the main character Billy Danger, and came up with nothing. So, in order to let others know that I'd worked on it and couldn't come up with any way of providing more links, I put the att tag in the orphan template, and noted that I'd tried in the edit summary. Where did I go wrong? Agathman (talk) 02:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Sending you a message, by clicking the link where you've said "please send me a message", is "unconstructive"?
Hello? Have you set up an automated response so that you respond to any message saying it's "unconstructive?" I'm confused. Oh, sorry, forgot to sign. Agathman (talk) 02:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
I wouldn't call this edit vandalism. He was doing what I wanted him to do, which would make it acceptable on Misplaced Pages. The edit did not just get rid of the speedy, but fixed the article correctly. He may not have handled it properly. but he is new. Thanks! Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 02:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
RE: The Last Emperor
there. a better edit summary :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by RuthlessOne (talk • contribs) 03:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
User:Oliversbio
I tried explaining the whole public domain thing to him but he doesn't quite get it. I tried helping him but to no avail. Momusufan (talk) 03:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Corey Taylor page
If you want a page full of unsourced info to stand with your name on it, be my guest. I'll keep trying to keep Wiki an encyclopedia with my own efforts.Portia327 (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Vicini
Why did you reverted the edits I was doing. That pages has no links or external sources, and I was adding them. It has a tag placed that says that it is an orphan and to help improve it. I as doing so. I was correcting some gramatical errors, not (spelling). --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 03:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
revert
I added a reference to Irresistible force paradox article, and it got reverted by you within seconds and I got some sort of automated warning on my talk page from you. What is that about? Can't I add youtube videos as source? TheFreeloader (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Tupolev Tu-95
Tupolev Tu-95 edit I performed was removing a computer generagted image of what they claim is the Tupolev Tu-95. I removed it for several reasons. 1) It is a computer generated image, not an actual photo. 2) It is a poor representation of a Tupolev Tu-95 aircraft, and though only airplane geeks would notice, I thought that was the point of having people edit wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Helloaday (talk • contribs) 03:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- The image is not CG.Ratsbew (talk) 05:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Candidate for Speedy Deletion
Your comment was listed as "unconstructive" on a page I recommended for speedy deletion, Lil Henchmen. What exactly does that mean? I proposed the article for speedy deletion that was reverted several times. I'm curious, did you even review the page? I believe that the edit summary provided the necessary information as the page in question seem to be under dispute. JustAKnowItAll (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Huggle Reverts
Hi, you may need to slow down and do closer inspections of the edits you are reverting :) Unomi (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recents reverts
The edits and reverts you are making appeared to be unconstructives. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edits are constructives, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to readAGF. Thank you. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Using Huggle
Hi, Fastily! I should inform you that there is a thread at WP:AN/I regarding one of your huggle reverts. I assume the revert itself was a mistake, but I suggest you be more careful when using this tool. As it says, "Huggle is a tool for dealing with vandalism. Its nature requires that it is capable of editing pages quickly, and of making many edits in a short space of time. Such features should be used with caution." And also, "Responsibility for edits rests with the owner of the account with which they are made. "Use of an automated tool" is not an excuse." Please use huggle only for clear cases of vandalism and other unconstructive edits, and do not use it for anything you are unsure of. Make sure an edit needs to be reverted before you hit the revert button. Assume good faith when it seems appropriate. In such cases, reverting should be done manually and huggle should not be used. Cheers. Chamal 05:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Happy Easter!
.jpg)
On behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --A Nobody 06:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Questionable Revert
I do not see how my addition was 'unconstructive' or irrelevant.
How far apart is 'VINCERE VEL MORI - "To conquer or die"' and '“VINCE AUT MORIRE” (Conquer or Die)'?
Especially, when concurrent similar information is given.
I believe you are mistaken in your change.
If you feel the format of providing backing information is technically incorrect, I suggest you change only that portion.
It appears, by looking at your messages, that you are overzealous with reverts. Perhaps, a bit more caution?
Nantucketnoon (talk) 09:02, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Nantucketnoon (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Reconsideration
I appreciate your reconsideration of my edits to Corey Taylor. Portia327 (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)