This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bedford (talk | contribs) at 13:14, 15 November 2005 (→No military, no presidency). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:14, 15 November 2005 by Bedford (talk | contribs) (→No military, no presidency)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)I can't believe there is no talk page for this article. For someone that people think will be the next Republican presidential candidate, there's not much here. I'll go out on a limb and make a prediction here (yes I know WP is not a crystal ball): Allen-Rice would be a winning ticket for the right, even if HRC does run. Just thought I'd go on record so when it happens, I can have bragging rights. --LV 21:51, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
No military, no presidency
With the war on terror, Americans will want a strong leader with a military background. When it comes time to pull the lever, Hillary, her lack of international and military experience will make her too weak for voters. George Allen is in the same boat. Gilluiani's pro-choice stance is too liberal for the GOP and the nation is not ready (I am) for a female, black president, with no prior service record (maybe in peace time). That leaves a possible McCain / Kerry show down in 2008 with McCain winning easily.
- McCain has done almost everything possible to piss-off the Republican base. He can't get nominated unless he goes ahead and joins the Democrats. All George Allen needs to do is to satisfy the Republican base with his words and actions, and he's a shoo-in to be the next president.