Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nancy (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 26 April 2009 (Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Defecation. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Due to your constant work new page patrolling. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 01:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that undo

Thanks for reverting the Melbourne, Florida page. I was wondering what that "chubby....." comment was doing... Jameson L. Tai 00:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

NP Yourname 22:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of COEA

Might I inquire as to the reasoning behind the removal? Was it the lack of notability? Jimbatka (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

‎National Bank of Sudan

Just to let you know, you've placed an incorrect speedy deletion tag on ‎National Bank of Sudan and it has caused some confusion. I've changed it over to the speedy deletion test tag since the National Bank of Sudan article is a copy of Bank of Sudan. --Rent A Troop (talk) 02:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Your edit summary at Apkljsaslkdflkksj

Two remarks because of your edit summary in the page's history which appears to be directed at me. 1) If you look at the author's talkpage you'll see that we both tagged the article for deletion at the same time. 2) Actually, db-nonsense is the only right tag for this kind of BS. As the CSD criteria say: "patent nonsense, consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." I don't think an article that says

farkejlekjaweeorqewoiufarkejlfarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweuuiweriuweuiwerqiweiuwrfarkejlekjawee orqewoiuweoiwefarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweuuiweriuweuiwerqiweiuwrfarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweu

can be called anything else. Anyway, just for your information. Happy hunting, Yintaɳ  22:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Deleted as patent nonsense. For it to have been vandalism there would have had to be some ill intent, this may have just been a test edit. Chillum 22:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

MMMKKAAY ill try to rember that, but i always that that something written really badly was nonsense and this was vandalism. Ok thanks for cleearing this "nonsense" up! (get it nonsense, ya it stupid i know!) Yourname (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Banstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		----Bugz were here!--t--c--⇾ Bugboy, gives you The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for reading his mind, and giving the long awaited Fauna Barnstar (It looks cool) Bugboy52.4 (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Awards

Can you explain? Bugboy52.4 (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Read it.... They are awards that you award your self with. So pick the ones your a eligible for and award yourself! Yourname (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but which shows which award you get, time spent on wikipedia or the number of edits, and giving myself awards ruins the sense of appreciation from other people, but the more the merrier I always say. Bugboy52.4 (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Defecation. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Take it to the talk page and achieve consensus before replacing the images (if that is what consensus decrees) or I will personally block you. This is nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with operating in a collegiate environment. Nancy 20:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)