Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HighInBC (talk | contribs) at 21:47, 26 April 2009 (sp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Due to your constant work new page patrolling. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 01:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that undo

Thanks for reverting the Melbourne, Florida page. I was wondering what that "chubby....." comment was doing... Jameson L. Tai 00:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

NP Yourname 22:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of COEA

Might I inquire as to the reasoning behind the removal? Was it the lack of notability? Jimbatka (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

‎National Bank of Sudan

Just to let you know, you've placed an incorrect speedy deletion tag on ‎National Bank of Sudan and it has caused some confusion. I've changed it over to the speedy deletion test tag since the National Bank of Sudan article is a copy of Bank of Sudan. --Rent A Troop (talk) 02:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Your edit summary at Apkljsaslkdflkksj

Two remarks because of your edit summary in the page's history which appears to be directed at me. 1) If you look at the author's talkpage you'll see that we both tagged the article for deletion at the same time. 2) Actually, db-nonsense is the only right tag for this kind of BS. As the CSD criteria say: "patent nonsense, consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." I don't think an article that says

farkejlekjaweeorqewoiufarkejlfarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweuuiweriuweuiwerqiweiuwrfarkejlekjawee orqewoiuweoiwefarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweuuiweriuweuiwerqiweiuwrfarkejlekjaweeorqewoiuweoiweu

can be called anything else. Anyway, just for your information. Happy hunting, Yintaɳ  22:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Deleted as patent nonsense. For it to have been vandalism there would have had to be some ill intent, this may have just been a test edit. Chillum 22:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

MMMKKAAY ill try to rember that, but i always that that something written really badly was nonsense and this was vandalism. Ok thanks for cleearing this "nonsense" up! (get it nonsense, ya it stupid i know!) Yourname (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Banstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		----Bugz were here!--t--c--⇾ Bugboy, gives you The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for reading his mind, and giving the long awaited Fauna Barnstar (It looks cool) Bugboy52.4 (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Awards

Can you explain? Bugboy52.4 (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Read it.... They are awards that you award your self with. So pick the ones your a eligible for and award yourself! Yourname (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but which shows which award you get, time spent on wikipedia or the number of edits, and giving myself awards ruins the sense of appreciation from other people, but the more the merrier I always say. Bugboy52.4 (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Defecation. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Take it to the talk page and achieve consensus before replacing the images (if that is what consensus decrees) or I will personally block you. This is nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with operating in a collegiate environment. Nancy 20:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

I think you should hold off on giving out vandalism warnings as you did 3 times to Hans Adler. Your warnings are misplaced and not reflective of our policies. Somebody disagreeing with you in a content dispute is not vandalism, and Misplaced Pages not being censored does not mean we cannot exercise editorial control. You should not be warning users they will be blocked when it is in fact you that are misunderstanding policy. I have removed your report from Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism as baseless.

This is very similar to the issues you had in the past that led to previous blocks. Please do not be so confrontational when people disagree with you. Please do not revert back and forth when people don't agree with your edits. And please do not use vandalism warnings when discussion is what is needed. I am considering you warned about this behavior.

I will remind you of our deal. When I unblocked you I said I would hold you to that promise and I intend to. Chillum 21:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Alright here we go agin do they own the artical i am adden information but they remove it why is it ok for them to do that but not me it seems 1 sided and not right. Yourname (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't see you getting consensus for this image. The fact that several people disagree with you does not mean people are owning the article, it means you don't have consensus. Chillum 21:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

If you check the talk page there seems to be a reasonable amount Yourname (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't see any consensus for the picture there. When people revert you then you need to go talk. Regarding your request that someone else deal with this instead of me because you feel attacked, the answer is no. The reason is when we met you were claiming another admin was attacking you and asked for someone else(it ended up being me). I checked, there was nothing inappropriate about how that admin treated you, nor is there anything inappropriate about how I am treating you. It seems you find people are acting unfair when they disagree with you. You can't just recuse one admin after another because you don't like what they tell you. Chillum 21:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

just foget it its not woth it only certan people are allow to edit wikipead and other can't this is such a load of what im editing it not woth it anymore just forget it, you have to be a person in good stainds to edit here forget this site im done thank you to hand and that other guyYourname (talk) 21:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, that is your choice. If you do change your mind and decide to edit again, please know that this sort of thing will get you blocked in the future. You are welcome to discuss changes that other people disagree with and seek consensus. Chillum 21:47, 26 April 2009 (UTC)