Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs) at 13:18, 2 May 2009 (BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Nimbley6

Nimbley6 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Nimbley6/Archive.

Report date May 2 2009, 13:18 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Lovetolovecraig (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by This flag once was red_deeds

• Recently I've been going straight to WP:ANI with Nimbley6's socks, however I'm not convinced that this editor necessarily passes the WP:DUCK-test. Feel free to WP:TROUT me and send me onwards to WP:ANI ;-)
• Nimbley6 is a serial sock puppeteer, with a fascination for Scotland and Scottish topics, particularly musicians and bands. Typically Nimbley6 will use dynamic IP addresses, but does occasionally create registered usernames. Typical behaviour includes creating articles (often within a sock's first few edits), adding images to articles (the images will frequently, as is the case here, be blatant copyvios or breaches of fair-use, and a WP:POINTy obsession with the primacy of Scotland over the UK.
• I believe Lovetolovecraig is another Nimbley6 sock, however this editor has been editing for nearly a week now and - while I have been monitoring their edits for all that time - their behaviour has been less obviously Nimbley6-ish than past socks. I am therefore concerned about jumping to conclusions and simply requesting a block on WP:ANI - for that reason I feel a checkuser, or at least a second pair of eyes, is appropriate.

Cheers, This flag once was red_deeds 13:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )

Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by This flag once was red_deeds 13:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

• Open SPI cases
• SPI requests for pre-CheckUser review