This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pablo X (talk | contribs) at 14:12, 20 May 2009 (-→Talkback). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:12, 20 May 2009 by Pablo X (talk | contribs) (-→Talkback)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please click here to post a new message. You'll be joining these people. If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page; if I have left you a message on your talk page please reply there, I will be watching it. There's no need to leave one of those ugly {{talkback}} messages. |
yahn (2005—2007) | tahn (2009)
Regarding G. Shanmugam
A Good Morning to you (at least it's morning here). To deny a speedy deletion it is sufficient if there are alegations of notability (which in this case were there: "...eminent.." and "...leading the institute to become one of the best self financed...". I agree that the article would probably be deleted via an AfD, but speedy is out of the question. Cheeers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
explanation
I removed an unreference tag from an article that already had references.
I see now you added the tag, and then added the references.
There are, I am afraid, some contributors who go around slapping tags like {{unreferenced}} on articles without regard to whether they are applicable, based on their personal cultural biases. I thought this tag application was an example of that.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)