This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CyclePat (talk | contribs) at 23:08, 25 November 2005 (→Technology and engineering: fixed the formating of motorized bicycle). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:08, 25 November 2005 by CyclePat (talk | contribs) (→Technology and engineering: fixed the formating of motorized bicycle)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcut- ]
Biology and related
- Talk:Female_Nobel_Prize_laureates — A dispute exists as to the neutrality of one section of this article.
- præpuce — A dispute exists at præpuce about whether the præpuce helps protect the protective properties against heat cold, mechanical, et cetera, to such structures as the glans, meatus, frænulum, its own inner smooth and ridge mucosa, et cetera. One side claims it does, while the other side claims that the præpuce is devoid of function. The discussion on the talkpage can be found here: Præpuce
- Talk:Prostate cancer - what constitutes a suitable external link for a medical article? On what grounds should these links be removed? 13:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Template talk:Suicide-- Should this navigational template for suicide related pages include a short statement that "medical consensus is that people who are considering suicide or having suicidal thoughts should seek immediate assistance"?--Kewp (t) 07:35, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- talk:engram Is engram widely use in Neuroscience? 11:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Mathematics
- Talk:Arabic numerals- Dispute over relative emphasis of Hindu and Arabic contributions. 14:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Mathematics. How to define mathematics. Is the current version POV and/or original research? 15:52, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Sciences
Clinical sciences
- talk:Simon Wessely -- POV conflict, mostly relating about Simon Wessely's work on Chronic Fatigue Syndrom. The page is now protected temporarily to deal with libel. 10:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Natural science
- talk: Tropical Storm Alpha (disambiguation) and talk: Tropical Storm Alpha (2005) -- Should there be disambiguation of something which is not ambiguous? Isn't is just sufficient to link to article titles which are only similar and not identical (in this case Subtropical Storm Alpha of 1972 and Subtropical Storm Alfa of 1973) to avoid confusion? It is proper for one or two users to almost immediately revert such good faith changes in articles? –radiojon 14:12, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Alcubierre_metric -- Should an article describing a scheme for faster-than-light travel exclude a statement of the standard understanding that faster-than-light travel is equivalent to time travel? 02:05 30 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Fire -- see the section on burninate; does fire's role in animation/cartoons merit a place on this page? 05:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Physical science
- Talk:Big Bang – How much room should be given to discussing critisms of the Big Bang hypothesis. 14:50, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:False Doppler – Long dispute about the validity of the term "false doppler". 14:52, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Telecommunications and digital technology
- Talk:Gnu/linux - Basically boils down to whether Gnu/linux should redirect to Linux or GNU/Linux_naming_debate. 00:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Blue screen of death#Foo Screen of Death merge - Should the various other Screens of Death be merged into Blue screen of death? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 23:59, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Technology and engineering
- Talk:Motorized bicycle#Merger: The merger of moped with motorized bicycle 22:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Timeline of Motorized bicycle history and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Motorized bicycle history: For the article Timeline of Motorized bicycle history it has been put in the deletion process contrary to WP:RFC. "The first resort should always be to discuss the problem with the other user. Try to resolve the dispute on your own first." Some Users believe the creator has a point to prove. Debate also concerns the relevance of facts being submited (inclusion vs. noninclusion) and the idea of duplicating information from a timeline within the article motorized bicycle. Discussions and edits are escallating from mediocre wikietiquette to bad. References:
-
- 22:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Nuclear weapon - Should a separate A-bomb article exist, or is it better merged with Nuclear weapon and/or Nuclear weapon design? -- 20:58, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Motorized bicycle and Electric bicycle - on whether or not motorized bicycle and electric bicycle should be one article or two. --Woohookitty 04:55, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act - on whether or not suspending state liability laws and preventing private persons from insuring themselves against a nuclear catastrophy is protecting the public or Unprotecting the public 00:56, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Please note that Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act has already undergone the RfC process and is now in Mediation. 04:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, this is just a delaying tactic. Please ignore it. --Woohookitty 08:05, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Whats going on with this? no mention on the page or talk page, but suggestion in the archive contining four day old discussion that this is ongoing??? Sandpiper 02:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Essentially, I put a test RfC for user Ben Gatti on my personal user page. He decided to open up a RfC on Price-Anderson Act even though we're in our 2nd mediation and this is a long long LONG standing dispute. It goes back to June. I ended up having the one on my user page deleted because it was being edited by Ben and this was just going to be a practice thing. Anyway, his RfC was just a response to mine. As you can see, we're over 400K in archives. If you want to participate, by all means do so. But honestly, it's not absolutely necessary. --Woohookitty 04:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Unclassified
- Talk:American Medical Association - Should the POV flag stay or go? 05:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Magnetic resonance imaging - Is it wise to have an animated image, contrary to WAI guidelines, on a page which will be of particular interest to people with epilepsy and other brain-related illnesses? 00:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)