Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tothwolf (talk | contribs) at 19:51, 26 May 2009 (→The Digital Gangster LP: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Digital Gangster LP

The Digital Gangster LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no reliable sources to attest to its notability Theserialcomma (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

• Delete No third party sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 20:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete no reliable sources, fails notability guidelines, most relevantly that for albums.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC, I can't find any reliable sources. Drawn Some (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC#Albums.  Esradekan Gibb  01:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, redirect to YTCracker and protect since obviously anons think that their love of the album supersedes any policies. No evidence of notability, search on google turns up sales sites, the DG webpage, blogs, twitters and the like. No evidence of reviews in reliable, secondary sources. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/_complex 11:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep Clear violation of WP:POINT with a lot of WP:IDONTLIKEIT from the nom.
  Per WP:NALBUMS: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Misplaced Pages."
  Theserialcomma's nominations of Nerdrap Entertainment System and The Digital Gangster LP for AfD are clearly intended to be disruptive and are a continuation of the disruption surrounding the YTCracker article. See: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#YTCracker
  YTCracker's article survived AfD and has been rewritten to include plenty of sources despite Theserialcomma's attempts to gut the article.
  Theserialcomma continued to edit war over the YTCracker article even during the AfD
  --Tothwolf (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Note the word may in that sentence, as well as the first line of that section "All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." - find sources that document coverage of the album and it will not be deleted. Your accusation against TSC is in bad faith, uncivil and ignores the five other editors who !voted to delete. To remain a separate page, it needs reliable, independent, secondary sources. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/_complex 14:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Clearly others also feel it passes the notability guidelines
I made no "accusations" and I backed up what I've stated about Theserialcomma's behaviour regarding these articles with diffs. If you want to talk about failure to assume good faith, your comment above "... and protect since obviously anons think that their love of the album supersedes any policies" shows that you are doing just that. Tothwolf (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

• Merge to YTcracker. Otherwise, there is very little, if anything, for independent notability. MuZemike 15:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Media and music)
• AfD debates