This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EPresslerHenderson (talk | contribs) at 19:08, 29 May 2009 (Asking for advice on removing a "general notability guideline" tag.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:08, 29 May 2009 by EPresslerHenderson (talk | contribs) (Asking for advice on removing a "general notability guideline" tag.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | I am looking for help! Ask your question below. You can also check Help:Contents and the FAQ, or ask at the Help desk or the Teahouse. Users who monitor the category Wikipedians looking for help and those in Misplaced Pages's Live Help have been alerted and will assist you shortly. You can also join the chat room to receive live Misplaced Pages-related help there. You'll be receiving help soon, so don't worry. Note to helpers: Once you have offered help, please nullify the template using {{Tl}} or similar, replace with {{Help me-helped}}, or where {{Help me|question}} was used, use {{Tlp}}/{{Tnull}} |
An article I watch and have started trying to develop into a decent wiki article (Dale Rogers Training Center) has been flagged with the "general notability guideline" tag (even though it existed for over a year and was never tagged as such up until now). My question: what exactly would make it appropriate for me to remove this tag? Most tags have obvious fixes, but there is quite a lot of subjectivity to this one. After reading Misplaced Pages:Notability and Misplaced Pages:Notability (organizations and companies), I feel like there are enough articles on the subject/organization to qualify it as "notable," but I can also see some people arguing against it because there aren't many national/international articles.
Category: