This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gpia7r (talk | contribs) at 18:12, 7 July 2009 (Message re. National-Anarchism (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:12, 7 July 2009 by Gpia7r (talk | contribs) (Message re. National-Anarchism (HG))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Operation Rescue (Kansas) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andrewrp 15:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Operation Rescue (Kansas)
Hi there. I have reverted your edit to Operation Rescue (Kansas) based on Misplaced Pages:Naming_conflict#Self-identifying_terms. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you think that the policy that Dawn bard linked to is wrong, the onus is on you to start a discussion to change it. Stop accusing people of being "right-wing" and "not understanding what consensus is". J.delanoyadds 16:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- The "right-wing" comment was related to something outside our exchange. But I'm sure that won't stop you from butting in and reverting my edits to that other article as well, just because you can get away with it.
- You quite obviously don't understand what "consensus" means. It's an observation, not an accusation. Seriously, look it up.
- And stop waving policy in my face.
- Per http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consensus, a consensus is a "general agreement". The policy that Dawn bard linked to, and indeed all policies on the site, are a result of a general agreement of most editors on Misplaced Pages.
- IAR ends exactly where another editor disagrees with you. If you decide you want to ignore all rules, you had better be prepared to explain yourself. Especially if your actions are in explicit opposition with an existing policy. J.delanoyadds 16:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- And stop waving policy in my face.
- Consensus, simply put, is when opposing views are considered and every effort is made to fold them into any decisions that are made. You clearly don't understand this. You clearly equate consensus with democracy.
- You clearly don't understand what IAR means, either. Your description renders it meaningless.
July 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page National-Anarchism has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gpia7r (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |