Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rak-Tai (talk | contribs) at 17:17, 16 August 2009 (Article for deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Proposed deletion of Fezara

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fezara, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No sourced sited, much content seems to be untruthful.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Jake Wartenberg 19:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Updating RTL list

Hi Sarcelles, sorry I haven't responded in a while; I don't want you to think I have been ignoring your e-mail about the new edition of the Laogai Handbook. Anyway, I have been working (very slowly and intermittently) on updating the entire list, but I'm doing it in my sandbox (User:Politizer/Sandbox) rather than the main article, since I want to be able to post all the changes at once rather than have the article in limbo for a long time. Right now I'm down to Inner Mongolia (you can tell which sections I haven't updated yet because the Established columns are empty; I didn't include establishment dates in the original article, but I am adding them as I go now). Anyone is welcome to edit, but you're not required to (it just means it might take me a few more weeks to finish it on my own). Politizer /_contribs 20:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey Sarcelles, just so you know, I finished this about a week ago and moved it all into the main article. Best, rʨanaɢ /_contribs (formerly Politizer) 14:06, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Papua conflict

Mixing WP:AGF WP:BITE and a few other policies which prevent my skepticism full expression - and in good faith I might ask -

I am at a loss as to why Papua Conflict was created - have you checked all the other articles that exist regarding the location? There are articles in which the conflict is mentioned.

Please feel free to correct me if I have misunderstood your intentions with that new article.SatuSuro 23:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I think that current conflicts, that have caused casualties should have an article about them.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Cameroon and poverty statistic

Hi, Sarcelles! I removed the poverty statistic you added to the Cameroon page's introduction, and I wanted to let you know why. Earlier today, I cleaned up the article, and I moved that statistic to the body of the article rather than the introduction. The introduction already mentions that large numbers of Cameroonians live in poverty, and for the lead section of an article, that should be good enough. The body of the article is really the best place to go into hard numbers like the statistic you added. For more information, you can check out WP:LEAD and WP:SUMMARY. Thanks! — Dulcem (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to numerous articles (including Guatemala and Yemen) are following this incorrect pattern of inserting new information regarding poverty rates into the lead. These articles have appropriate sections for economy. Additionally, your edit summaries are uninformative. Describing things as "enhanced" is meaningless, since the purpose of editing is enhancement. You might want to consider something closer to "added information on poverty rate". Your information and sources are useful additions. With appropriate placement and summaries, your edits will be far more useful.Novangelis (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Novangelis and Dulcem, thank you for your messages. I apologize for my uninformative edit summaries. Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

RTL

There is a discussion at Talk:List of Re-education Through Labor camps in China#In quest for "Judong" or Misplaced Pages Laowai Handbook?. Since you have been involved in editing this list, you may be interested. rʨanaɢ /_contribs 00:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.

Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jehovah's Witnesses in Nigeria

I have nominated Jehovah's Witnesses in Nigeria, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jehovah's Witnesses in Nigeria. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jeffro77 (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Christians on Chinese city articles

Hi, it seems like you are going around and including how many Christians now live in a large number of Chinese cities, and you are citing the same reference. As the reference is a book or other non-Internet publication I would like to see it verifiable by WP:V. A lot of the claims, like Zhejiang having a 10% Christian population, is quite dubious. Having been there lately I actually find this number to be extremely hard to believe. I would ask you to stop inserting these one-sentence snippets on Christianity until we can verify the information. Is that okay? Colipon+(T) 21:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Holiness tabernacles

It appears you might have created an article: 16:39, 23 July 2005 (hist) (diff) Holiness Tabernacles ‎ (Main source : World Christian Encyclopedia). I cannot make any sense of the content of this article. I have served as an official in holiness churches in America, and have a wide knowledge of the holiness movement. I know of no such denomination. Further, there are confusing and inaccurate statements. The article should be listed for deletion. Respectfully, R/T-รัก-ไทย (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)