Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) at 00:05, 29 August 2009 (fix improper formatting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

FuriousJorge

FuriousJorge (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/FuriousJorge/Archive.

Report date August 27 2009, 18:41 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• WizardSleeve (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 67.84.209.35 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Daedalus969

This IP shows up after the suspected master account relays that one more person is needed to decide the outcome of a discussion on a talk page.— Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

LOL! Let me know how the investigation turns out.FuriousJorge (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )

Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by — Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

This is vote fraud, but not in the traditional sense. It is vote fraud in the process of determining if article consensus exists amongst editors. CU is needed as it is not clear cut, and the IP may not be related, but there is a good chance it is.— Dædαlus 18:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

For future reference, you're better off waiting for more than a single edit before requesting CU. Nathan 14:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Then may I simply withdraw the CU request?— Dædαlus 19:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed – I highly doubt that coincidence brought WizardSleeve/IP to the discussion out of thin air. It's either a blatant attempt at meatpuppetry, or the two registered accounts are in fact the same person. Hence, we could use CU to look for any technical evidence between the two registered accounts. MuZemike 23:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

• Open SPI cases
• SPI cases awaiting a CheckUser