Misplaced Pages

Talk:ArcelorMittal

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.15.65.36 (talk) at 16:44, 2 September 2009 (→clarification of place: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:44, 2 September 2009 by 74.15.65.36 (talk) (→clarification of place: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Mittal Steel should not be merged into the article ArcelorMittal for the following reasons: 1. Arcelor has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. 2. MittalSteel was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's 3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal EVil-Aer (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about .

clarification of place

"Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America?

The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'.