Misplaced Pages

Talk:ArcelorMittal

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 16:46, 2 September 2009 (Signing comment by 74.15.65.36 - "→clarification of place: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:46, 2 September 2009 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 74.15.65.36 - "→clarification of place: new section")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Mittal Steel should not be merged into the article ArcelorMittal for the following reasons: 1. Arcelor has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. 2. MittalSteel was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's 3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal EVil-Aer (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about .

clarification of place

"Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America?

The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.65.36 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)