This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Action potential (talk | contribs) at 08:56, 19 December 2005 (Personal remark). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:56, 19 December 2005 by Action potential (talk | contribs) (Personal remark)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)==Reverts==
When you revert, please follow wikipedia conventions. Your last revert was in breach of wikipedia conventions. Please add RV: or revert: if you are reverting to a previous version. --Comaze 05:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration
Bookmain,
A complaint has been made against you in regard to the Nuero-linguistic programming article, with a request for arbitration. The basis of the case is that you are either a sock puppet, or otherwise involved with, breach of wikipedia policy and disruption to that article.
The request can be found at: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration
FT2 09:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Arbitration accepted
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 02:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Bias
These recent additions are biased.. . You know that occult, New Age and ritual are all point of view (POV). This may be in line with your personal belief or the belief of your group, but that is not shared by all so in the contributions; in the current form these violate wikipedia standards. You've been around here for long enough to know the policy. Let me know if you need more information. --Comaze 06:53, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Stop with the mock pontificating Comaze. All these are facts and they are represented perfectly well throughout the article. If you want to add citations to them, you can do so very easily by choosing any from the rest of the article. Bookmain 09:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Personal remark
Your edit contains personal remarks directed at me. Implying that I am "whitewashing" the article is false and misleading. If you wish to make a complaint do so at the arbitration evidence page, not in the public forum. Making personal remarks in a public forum on wikipedia is a violation of policy. --Comaze 08:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)