Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sceptic Ashdod (talk | contribs) at 18:35, 16 October 2009 (→Richard Goldstone). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sceptic Ashdod, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nableezy (talk) 16:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

splitting problems

Hi Sceptic, I hope you are not too upset with my perhaps overly bold split of the international law section, but the split is not over. We need to make a better summary and your help in that will be instrumental. But it really is not a big deal if it is not perfect right now. The reason I did the split is that there have been many times where a proposal for a major change had all the support it needed but nobody wanted to actually make the edit. I am not that bashful, so on occasion I went ahead and made the edit, and it has worked out well a number of times, the prime example is this monster edit to the casualties section that I am almost certain would never have gotten done if I didnt do it then. I guess my point is if you are upset just chill and lets get a better summary together. Sound good? nableezy - 05:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure. --Sceptic from Ashdod 12:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Sceptic, this talk page is getting pretty long, think it is about time you started archiving your talk page. You can do it manually (I do) or use a bot (there are a few out there, if you want help setting it up let me know). nableezy - 01:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to know how do you do it manually. --Sceptic from Ashdod 02:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Just start a new page at User talk:Sceptic Ashdod/Archive 1 and cut and paste what you want to archive from here to there. At the top of the archive page put the following:
{{talkarchive}} {{atn}}.
On this page put this at the top:
{{archive box collapsible|auto=long}}
Thats it. nableezy - 03:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Looks like Gibberish to me, but I'll try. --Sceptic from Ashdod 10:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Astonished, but seems that it worked. Thanks a lot. --Sceptic from Ashdod 10:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Colonel Richard Kemp

Indeed, I agree that Kemp is an important personality and his views should be given considerable weight. That's why I inserted one his quotes concerning IDF efforts to minimize casualties in the Cast Lead article. Unfortunately, many of my edits are deleted or modified for no apparent reason other than bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiujitsuguy (talk • contribs) 02:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

There are reasons and before just reverting and declaring an intention to edit war you may want to try and hear what those reasons are. nableezy - 03:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Guys,

• as you might noticed, i was absent for a couple of days and probably won't return to normal activities before the end of Yom Kippur. hope you'll do the job to preserve the articles we're working on.
• i don't know what is the actual reason this discussion appeared on my talk page, but indeed much criticism is spilt nowadays on the Goldstone mission for cherrypicking some witnesses and dismissing others (as well as lack of transparency, over-reliance on not so credible Palestinian witnesses (Abd Rabbo case) and so on and so forth). Speaking of Kemp, he was mentioned in the Australian lawer's submission, bullet #55. They also mention NGOs, #42-43. I also encourage you to read the answer of Goldstone to the question why he left the colonel out.
• Also, i ask you to consider the following criticism from JCPA researcher (original publication is here. --Sceptic from Ashdod 14:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

g'mar chatimah tovah (hope thats right) nableezy - 18:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Walla (expression of amazement, etc)! You did it again - surprised me. Thank u. --Sceptic from Ashdod 15:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Richard Goldstone

Hi, your talk through editsummaries is not nice. I suggest you do not write paternalistic nor directive. -DePiep (talk) 23:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe that is because I'm the hasbara member, POV-pusher and all of my edits serve Israeli-advocacy agenda and should be reverted once and for all. Isn't it time you make an application to the Human Rights Council, I guess they too believe that criticizing Israel is not antisemitism. --Sceptic from Ashdod 18:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC)