This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndySayler (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 20 December 2005 (Fictional Sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:07, 20 December 2005 by AndySayler (talk | contribs) (Fictional Sources)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)WTF! "radiological warfare might well be a far more safe and humane way to conduct extermination of large numbers of people, or the emptying out of troublesome political centres, than any of the various biological alternatives."
Note bolded words, it doesn't really seem to fit, does it??
Fictional Sources
This article seems to draw heavily from fictional sources for its information on the uses of radiological warfare. This seems to lead to much speculation and lack of actual fact. I suggest removing the paragraphs based on fictional works and rewriting them with actual cited scientific research.
Also, the last paragraph seems to be complete speculation. Its suggestion of ethical human mass killings is obviously not pertinent to the article; to say the least. I believe this paragraph should be removed entirely. Please comment.