Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Haizum (talk | contribs) at 06:04, 24 December 2005 (→Stop). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unblock request

Why was this user blocked?! Fire Star & I had determined that his past edits were not truly vandalism! Please read his discussion page to see what actually happened. I totally believed he was blocked unfairly and that this is really just biting inexperienced users without really seeing what actually happened. He hasn't done any editing since then and his only recent contributions was to his own talk page with me and Fire Star. I request that his block be immediately removed! --LifeStar 06:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

68.216.187.22 00:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted, since the block reason appears to have been a misunderstanding. I apologize for the lengthy delay since your request. // Pathoschild 13:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks.

Haizum 20:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Virginia Quarters

(deleted lies and whining)

Hello, again. You may have the name wrong. For example, there may in fact be a reference for what you call "Virginia Quarters" but it probably goes by another, more established name. I'm currently hunting down references for you. Please feel free to help. Once we find the actual name of the quarters variation (and determine that it matches), we can add your text back in. Until that time, please refrain from edit warring. --Viriditas 09:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: I didn't touch the page since you edited it. Oh, and btw, there are no other names for that variation. "Virginia Quarters" dates back to 2001, at least. The segment will be as verifiable as the others, and it will be reposted.

Haizum, I'm only trying to help. If what you say is true, it will not be added back into the article. I'm working on verifying the rest of the article as well, so your argument is fallacious. Please try to understand Misplaced Pages policies and how Misplaced Pages works before threatening to "repost" material that is not appropriate for our encyclopedia. I am willing to admit that a similar, more notable variation may exist, and if it does, we can salvage your text. Why not help me? Let's work together to improve the article. --Viriditas 09:36, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

False. The segment of the article will be restored, or most of the article will be taken down. In a matter of hours I will have 3rd party links that are as verifiable as the other links in the article. At that point, you will either have to just accept that the segment is verifiable, or remove the other segments that use the same 3rd party website as verification, then you will have to admit that you did not apply your standards fairly (because the Speed Quarters segment was left up the whole time), then I will be forced to report this to those that gave you administrative authority in order to make Misplaced Pages a better place. It's not complicated.' Haizum 09:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi. I've already verified the rest of the article, and I'm working on adding citations. I have not, however, verified "Virginia Quarters". Please see the task list I've added to the talk page and do a search on any of the variations listed. If they match the rules of what you call "Viriginia Quarters" (and you would have to prove that it does) then you may be in luck. Otherwise, your content will not be added back into the article until it meets basic Misplaced Pages policies. And btw, I'm not an admin. --Viriditas 09:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

As soon as the version is posted on the same websites that Speed Quarters is posted on, then it will be verifiable. And as I've said over and over again, if you don't repost it, then you are applying different standards to the same type of segment. Haizum 09:59, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Original research

Your addition of "Speed quarters" to Quarters is original research, and the external link you've provided seems to belong to you and a meatpuppet. --Viriditas 01:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

False:

The external link is not mine.

You've been repeatedly asked to explain why the citation for Speed Quarters is more reputable than the citation for Virginia Quarters, yet you continue to delete one and not the other.

You are blatantly warring. I am requesting peer review.

Also, please review the Wkipedia Civility Policy for your "meatpuppet" comments.

Haizum 01:35, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

Your addition of "Speed quarters" to Quarters is original research, and the external link you've provided seems to belong to you and a meatpuppet. -Viriditas

You just admitted that "Speed Quarters" is original research. Why did you repost the article then?

Haizum 01:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

I made a mistake. I meant your addition of "Virginia Quarters". In any case, since you have demonstrated that you refuse to stop spamming my talk page, from now on all discussion will take place at Talk:Quarters. If you have something to say to me about that topic, please post it there. I am respecfully asking that you do not use my talk page beacuse you don't appear to be familiar with Misplaced Pages:Talk pages. Thank you. --Viriditas 01:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:

No, you admitted that "Speed Quarters" is original research.

Haizum 01:49, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Please do not make personal attacks on other contributors. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on the contributor. For further help, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution. Thank you. --Viriditas 03:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Viriditas, review the Wkipedia Civility Policy for your "meatpuppet" comments. Haizum 05:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

I asked you not to post on my talk page. Please familiarize yourself with WP:SOCK and the use of the term "meatpuppet" on Misplaced Pages. Any other comments on Quarters should be addressed on Talk:Quarters. Thank you for your attention in this matter. --Viriditas 05:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Ok, so instead of an insult, it's a flat out lie. Good work. Haizum 06:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Abuse

It is a lie to say that he did not contradict himself.

It is a lie to say that he was not dishonest about citation information.

These are facts, not personal attacks. You had no right to delete my comments, which I stand by.

Haizum 05:42, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Blanking and WP:POINT

Your blanking and edit summary on Pwn states, "original research" is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. There are no verifiable or reputable references to support this article. Please contact Viriditas with any questions. You may want to review WP:NOR. Please do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to make a point. And, please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Misplaced Pages because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages! --Viriditas 06:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop

* blanking pages

* harassing and personally attacking other users

* threatening other users - specifically Striver

If you continue to do so you will be blocked for 24 hours. You have been warned in the past. This is your last warning. freestylefrappe 18:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)