This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rlove (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 24 December 2005 (expand). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:01, 24 December 2005 by Rlove (talk | contribs) (expand)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)In a command economy, the government determines production levels and sets prices. This is said to be advantageous because it prevents unscrupulous investors from taking advantage of consumers.
Free market advocates such as Milton Friedman have criticized the command economy on the grounds that centralized planning ignores the price signal and is therefore ineffective. Friedman and other economists also point out that not only does a command economy require central price coordination—an already difficult task, given the inability to utilize price signals—but the impossibility of juggling all of the prices within an economy, as all products are ultimately interrelated.
In a similar manner, the idea of a command economy has been criticized because of the inherently large transaction costs associated with the distribution of goods. A good example is the Soviet Union which suffered many shortages and inefficiencies due to bureaucratic oversight and neglect. This idea may be attributed to Ronald Coase who predicted the downfall of the Soviet Union because of insurmountable transaction costs.