Misplaced Pages

User talk:Grundle2600

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rd232 (talk | contribs) at 17:46, 13 December 2009 (→Blocked: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:46, 13 December 2009 by Rd232 (talk | contribs) (→Blocked: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

General note and advise

When you edit an article and your edit might be even a slightly controversial one (like the latter) you should seek input from an editor who offered you help and assistants: (User:Master of Puppets). You'll be better of by doing so and there is no "shame" at all to have an editor coaching you. As a matter of fact, AFD candidates are often taken a knowledgeable coach to succeed. The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 23:09, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Grundle2600 (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Don't take advice from people who can't spell it, and steer clear of anyone who doesn't practice what they preach. What did you think of the Heisman choice? Do you follow football Grundle? ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
hah hah, wherie funie, tchild-off-mitnide.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I like to listen to all sides of an argument, and any advice that can help to keep me from getting even more banned, or blocked, is appreciated. Everyone makes typos. I don't follow football, although as a resident of Pittsburgh, I was glad to hear that Terry Bradshaw, Mel Blount, Mean Joe Greene, Franco Harris, and Lynn Swann won the Superbowl again this year. Grundle2600 (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

I've indefinitely blocked you for your behaviour re Diane Francis. This behaviour constitutes an egregious violation of WP:BLP; of WP:SYNTH; and is part of a long-term pattern of disruptive editing. I am posting to ANI for discussion on the appropriate block length for this; in view of your history I think "indefinite" is a prime candidate, but I'm open to discussion. Rd232 17:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)