This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oakshade (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 8 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:12, 8 January 2010 by Oakshade (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Han Moo Do AMA
Apologies
Considering I am no longer going to contribute to Misplaced Pages, I don't see the point of leaving enemies behind me. I apologise for the overheated comment on your talk page, which you have duly deleted. The fact that we disagree over a law journal is no good reason for leaving a trail of hatred behind me. All the best. --Grasshopper6 (talk) 15:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Corkscrew store photo
that would be incredibly cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyapetty (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Sean Hannity
Greetings, Niteshift! I've asked an admin whom I respect greatly to weigh in on the whole Sean Hannity/waterboarding/sock puppet issue. Though he and I have collaborated on several articles in the past, we come from very distinct worldviews. As a self-described conservative Christian, he's actually probably more inclined to side with you, although I trust him completely to strive for a neutral point of view. (Not saying you don't... but again, I've worked with him many times.) Mainly, I'm hoping he can get to the bottom of the issue of sockpuppets and SPA's thwarting our efforts at consensus building. Looking forward to working with him, and you! -- JeffBillman (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't think that I've supported the inclusion of the waterboarding statement because I want to see criticism of him for the sake of criticism — I believe that it's better included as an example of his political views on a touchy subject. And your userboxes — see mine if you've not already looked. I'm not suspecting you of being a staffer working with a hidden POV :-) Nyttend (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- After giving the matter quite a bit of thought, I decided I agree with you on the Hal Turner issue. It's just not notable to an article on Sean Hannity. Indeed, about all that is notable about Hannity's days at WABC is that which already appears in the article-- and I say that as a fan of Hannity since shortly before his leaving WGST. (Yes, really! A non-traditional Libertarian who is a fan of a faithful Catholic conservative. Whodda thunk it? ;-) ) What worries me, though, is how the article has been redacted to the point that it does now seem to be askew of NPOV. And although the POV I think it now represents is not my own, that does not make it any more worrisome to me than if it had taken a POV that more closely matches my own. Cheers! -- JeffBillman (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Portal:Gang
I noticed that you been editing the Gang article . I just created a Portal (Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.--Zink Dawg -- 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
FYI
Rahm has created a new account and is editing under User_talk:See-Threepio. So far, doesn't seem to be especially disruptive, although MOS violations persist. I'll take a closer gander at his recent edits and go from there. Anyway, FYI. --EEMIV (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
40 Glocc
since i see your such a very good member, can ou please take your time to clean up 40 Glocc page.
- mainly The Jakal —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charaba (talk • contribs) 23:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
| The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Lauren Bernat
I recently recreated the article as Wii Fit Girl and was quickly reverted due to the previous AfD. However, I feel that the version I wrote clearly addressed the complaints of the article being about someone who is famous for only the YouTube video, in spite of the fact that she has been sued for the video, the lawsuit being covered by several news media outlets such as Fox News, she has appeared as a spokesperson for Electronic Arts' EA Sports Active, and has spawned several homages and "copycats". Perhaps the original version that was deleted seemed to be covering a person who was only famous for one thing, but this one I think clearly shows that she has done more than just be the Wii Fit Girl. If you could give your opinion on the matter to me, that would be excellent. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Your personal attack.
As for your statement, "For you to claim that I stated an "erroneous requirement" can only be explained by lack of attention or knowingly making a false accusation. I'll leave it to you to decide which it was," please follow WP:CIVIL and don't attack editors who disagree with you. Thank you.--Oakshade (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- In response to your comment on my talk page:...
- "That's not a personal attack. You made a false claim. I said I can see only 2 reasons for the false claim and left it to you to tell me which one it was. If there is a third possible reason, I'm sure you'll present it."
- There was no false claim. You repeatedly admonished editors for providing a "single" source and even asked "When did One article in a reliable source become sufficient coverage to meet GNG?".
In addition, attacking someone's comments as "whining" is also a personal attack. I know you are angry and upset that consensus was against your AfD, but that that is not an excuse for poor behavior. --Oakshade (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)- In response to your comment on my talk page:
- "*I quite clearly stated the policy correctly. It was very clear that I said the multiple sources were preferred. Nowhere did I say they were mandatory. Therefore, your accusation was false. I believe your complaint is baseless and just whining. I am not angry about the AfD. Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about. The fact that you believe that an AfD about some non-notable "artist" is important enough for me to get angry over shows that you don't. If I am bothered by anything, it is that I believe GNG is being misapplied. And there was no poor behavior in the AfD to excuse. I am done discussing this with you and any posts to my talk page about the topic will be immediately deleted unread. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)"
- Perhaps you didn't notice, but in the AfD I acknowledged you stated multiple sources were preferred.. But unlike you, I won't violate WP:CIVIL and attack you for "lack of attention or knowingly making a false accusation" as you choose to do.
You've unfortunately choose to use the word "whining" yet again. All I can say is such words are uncivil and apparently you are not aware of that. --Oakshade (talk) 00:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)