Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alison (talk | contribs) at 08:15, 23 January 2010 (→Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Checkuser results). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

• Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
• Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
• Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date January 22 2010, 21:04 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• 142.58.94.90 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Lorast (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Hipocrite

As normal. Now engaging in vandalism to prop up his comrades in arms.

Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Added Lorast. Typical MoO, typical topics, typical language. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Almost certainly not Scibaby. Please decline checkuser. -Atmoz (talk) 21:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Who could it be, then? Hipocrite (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: B  + E (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism and community ban/sanction evasion)

Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Any reason why this cannot be handled directly by AIV? Tim Song (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

The immediate vandalism could. However, SciBaby (or whichever of the anti-science sockmasters is running this ipsock) typically run hoardes of sleeper accounts. Discovering those is the real goal. Hipocrite (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

 Additional information needed Could you please elaborate upon why you think the IP is Scibaby's? Regards, Spitfire 21:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Absolutly. He's demonstrated a desire to help out his co-warriors about global warming. He's demonstrated an utter disregard for the encyclopedia, and given the immediate knowledge of terms like "WP:IAR" he's obviously someone's sock. The most frequent anti-AGW sockmaster is Scibaby, thus, this IP is probably Scibaby. Hipocrite (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

• Rather obvious on behaviour, IMO. And  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s).  No comment with respect to IP address(es). - the following accounts;

Lorast (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

THX788 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

LLstor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Pingshow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

- Alison 08:15, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

• Open SPI cases