This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Matthead (talk | contribs) at 23:12, 17 March 2010 (→March 2010: Siëch, elendr). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:12, 17 March 2010 by Matthead (talk | contribs) (→March 2010: Siëch, elendr)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
User talk:Matthead/Archive2006 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Did you know & Signpost
24 December 2024 |
|
- ... that a hypothesized land bridge may have allowed some fish species (example pictured) to migrate from South America to Cuba?
- ... that a Sunday afternoon phone call to Ken Battle laid the foundations for the Canadian Child Benefit program?
- ... that in the narrative epic Pem Nem, the union of two lovers is a metaphor for the union of the soul with God?
- ... that after becoming a born again Christian, soprano Jane Stuart Smith abandoned a successful opera career to pursue a life of service?
- ... that Singapore's first R-rated play was performed despite the police finding parts of it "offensive"?
- ... that the Filipino boy band SB19 considered disbandment after their debut single "Tilaluha" saw little success?
- ... that Richard Stratton's diplomatic career took him "from South America to Japan, and from Southern Africa to the foothills of the Himalayas"?
- ... that among the millions of prisoners of war murdered by the Germans during WWII there were also tens of thousands of their former allies, the Italians?
- ... that American football player Noah Knigga went viral for his last name and had to clarify its pronunciation?
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Matthead! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Klaus Ludwig - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jochen Neerpasch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Max Welti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Herbert Linge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Davy Jones (racing driver) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ellen Lohr - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Marc Duez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Justin Bell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Klaus Fischer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Giovanni Galli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Wolfgang von Trips
Hello, I thought I should let you know that I've requested a page move from Wolfgang Graf Berghe von Trips to Wolfgang von Trips, as you made the original move a few years ago.--Midgrid(talk) 21:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Medal table
Ich denke am vielversprechendsten wäre es vorerst nur die FRG/GER Fusion zu unterstützenden. Wenn ich mir die zurückliegenden Versuche anschaue hier einen Konsens zu erlangen, denke ich, dass hier die Logik am meisten überzeugt. Wäre schön wenn Du die Variante unterstützen könntest. Es sieht so aus als wenn hier langer Atem und konsequentes Argumentieren notwendig wäre. Cheers KarlMathiessen (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
User talk:Sandstein#Your attention needed
I'd appreciate your comment on this. Sandstein 09:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may appeal it by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below; but you should read our guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks first. Sandstein 22:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
This is a block per WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions for your nationalist WP:BATTLEground conduct and harrassment at as discussed at . Please stop this. Sandstein 23:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Matthead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=What? Loosmark follows me around, provoking me repeatedly, and Sandstein blocks me? What a lop-sided act. No wonder admin Sandstein was recommended on the EEML mailing list, and Loosmark has chosen to complain on his talk, successfully. Somewhere, somebody is laughing his ass off. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}