This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SamJohnston (talk | contribs) at 10:01, 27 April 2010 (→COI Reminder: expanded). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:01, 27 April 2010 by SamJohnston (talk | contribs) (→COI Reminder: expanded)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)COI Reminder
Whether or not this is the result of a conflict, you have a clearly stated bias and should also be careful withWP:V and WP:NPOV. Promoting the questionable criticism section to the top of the article was particularly problematic. -- samj insup>out 00:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- The cloud computing article is not neutral. Being critical of that isn't COI. According to your blog, you work for a major stakeholder in "cloud computing". That's COI. You should avoid calling the kettle black and avoid interfering with neutral third parties. Wtsao (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- See WP:NOTCOI - citing WP:COI without associated policy violations can be considered a personal attack and calling yourself a "neutral third party" when you have a clearly stated bias is disingenuous at best. -- samj in 09:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism reminder
Hello, I'm SamJohnston. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to cloud computing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- samj in 00:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Mass reverting changes made in good faith is vandalism. You calling me a vandal, that's hypocrisy. Wtsao (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)