This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GiacomoReturned (talk | contribs) at 18:00, 17 May 2010 (→Afflatus: Keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:00, 17 May 2010 by GiacomoReturned (talk | contribs) (→Afflatus: Keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Afflatus
- Afflatus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In my opinion, this article is a violation of WP:NOT, because it's a definition of a word. It does not significantly expand on the content of the Wiktionary entry -. The term "Romantic Afflatus" has been widely used, but I'm not sure whether it meets general inclusion requirements, and there's a good discussion of the concept at Artistic inspiration#Enlightenment and Romantic models. If "Romantic Afflatus" is a suitable topic for an article, it do not believe it should be under this title, because Cicero's one metaphorical use of the word "Afflatus" is a separate matter to the concept. Claritas (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2010 (UTC) Speedy Keep I cannot understand why this is nominated for deletion. It explains very well and little known term that is a blue link (proving its need) in several articles. Giacomo 18:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Categories: