This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fides Viva (talk | contribs) at 08:41, 23 January 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:41, 23 January 2006 by Fides Viva (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Violates Policy
This article is grossly biased and downright mean-spirited currently. It appears Fides_Viva is responsible. I see grammatical errors, thinly-veiled missives, and a completely unbalanced links section wherein only critiques are represented. --T3rmin 06:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Your advertisment for Dave Hunt's and his false teaching regarding Calvinism and both you and his lies and misrepresentation's of Calvinism are taken note of by God Himself and you will both have to give an account to God on Judgment Day. You have been warned of your sinful wickedness. Repent. Removing links to critiques of Hunt's falsehoods will not help you, I am most pleased I am not in your shoes. Why do you worship Dave Hunt? He is only a sinner like you and me. He never showed anything wrong about Calvinism, Dave Hunt is a liar. Hunt misquotes and distorts the truth about Calvinism and so do you. This comment is false and misleading, and Dave Hunt proved and showed nothing except his ignorance regarding the truth of Calvinism: "However, Hunt makes direct use of Calvinistic sources and maintains he is addressing the true nature and logical ends of Calvinism" Hunt twists and distorts and lies about Calvinistic sources. Read all the links I posted including the ones you took upon yourself to delete, where they show how Hunt twists and distorts the truth, you wicked person. Fides Viva 23:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Read the linked articles
See if they tell the truth about Dave Hunt or not. See where he misrepresents and tells lies about Calvinism.You are lying about me. I did not do all of the article and I am not mean-spirited. Check the log before you make anymore false accusations against my integrity. I am warning people that Dave Hunt is wrong, terribly wrong. What is "mean-spirited" about that? The articles and essays that critique Dave Hunts's falsehoods are true. More links exposing Dave Hunt's awful error of attacking other believers the better. Dave Hunt is the one that is mean-spirited and so are you, for pouncing on me like a bat out of hell. You both need to seriously repent! Fides Viva 07:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Policy
Fides Viva, I would refer you to Five_pillars and Misplaced Pages is not a Soapbox. The history shows neutrality in this article until your edits. The record will also show I've been more than fair in restoring neutrality while maintaining your points. Let's give the reader a chance to draw their own conclusions, shall we? Whether you or I agree with Dave Hunt (and I haven't said I do!) and whether the external links present truthful information or not is irrelevant. Misplaced Pages is a repository for information, not opinions. --T3rmin 05:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Daven Hunt is a liar
and a twister and distorter of the truth of Calvinism. He will have to face God for that. I have read two of his books: "The Seduction of Christianity" and Beyond Seduction" years ago and they were helpful, now I have nothing but contempt for them and will never ever read another book by him again, unless he repents and recants his atrocious book "What Love Is This", because of his blatant misrepresentation of Calvinism (as most do), even the direct sources he quotes from he twists and distorts and the logical conclusions of Calvinism by Dave Hunt are wrong. He makes the claim in another book that the Roman Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon and says the the Bible says so. That is another lie. Even though the Roman Catholic Church may be the Whore of Babylon, that shoe could fit any apostate churches foot, including Dave Hunt's. The Bible does not say that the Roman Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon. Dave Hunt used sloppy eisegesis there. Hunt has erred grievously and is unrepentant in his pride and arrogance, I have no time for his teachings at all now. And tell as many as I can to be wary of Dave Hunt. Your article about Dave Hunt is not unbiased, you are praising the man as if he could do no wrong. I am only trying set the record straight about Dave Hunt's lies and distortions. You need to broaden your research about Dave Hunt and stop thinking he is right, when he is actually radically wrong.
BTW, how can the reporting of facts and putting links to articles and essays that expose Dave Hunt's falsehood be biased, or not a NPOV? I am presenting the truth plainly as I can. That is all. Dave Hunt gets away with falsehoods, why? If Dave Hunt has lied, and he has, shouldn't that be revealed? Or is truth unimportant on Misplaced Pages? You want articles about liars like Dave Hunt on Misplaced Pages instead? Has Misplaced Pages turned into a bunch of lies?
Five_pillars and Misplaced Pages is not a Soapbox. <<< This means zilch to me if you are going to defend liars and distorters of the truth like Dave Hunt and give him glowing reports about what he has done and that is what your edits do. It will mean absolutely nothing, 0, on Judgment Day. Dave Hunt incorrectly and wrongfully attacks Calvinism. He is a man that hates being corrected and whines when his errors are exposed. He has done a lot of harm and damage. Fides Viva 08:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)