This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Williamb (talk | contribs) at 10:10, 5 April 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:10, 5 April 2004 by Williamb (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
None of the claims in this part of the article are actually backed up with anything but heresay. They don't belong in an encyclopedia.
The following has been added: Note: Former sections headed Criticism and Misuse of funds have been suppressed. Is there any doubt as to the accuracy of this prefatory note? Any complaint about the accuracy of 'suppressed' in this instance? Wetman 00:06, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- How can it be called "suppressed", when, according to the edit history, the text in question was added then later deleted (presumably because it is currently back in the Mother Teresa article) by the same person (Alexandros, aka Aplank)? Harris7 03:50, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Nearly only negatives claims in this article. Should be titled "Criticism against blabla". But has a pure criticist article a place in Misplaced Pages? gbog 14:45, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)