This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Difluoroethene (talk | contribs) at 21:04, 28 August 2010 (→Edit summaries). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:04, 28 August 2010 by Difluoroethene (talk | contribs) (→Edit summaries)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| This is InaMaka's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives | |
Index
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hello
|
You are invited to participate in WikiProject Houston, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about the Greater Houston area. |
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/InaMaka for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Stonemason89 (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Just for the record this so-called sockpuppet case turned out to be a revenge play by the Wikipedian who made the claim. NOTHING came out of the case and it was summarily shot down, showing the pettiness of the whole incident in the first place.--InaMaka (talk) 01:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Please don't make edit summaries like this: . I'm not a fan of Alveda King either, but comparing her to Fred Phelps is over the line. WP: BLP applies to edit summaries, too. Stonemason89 (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Alveda King
I noticed you made this edit in an attempt to warn an IP not to vandalize. While the edit the IP made was vandalism, it was not "racist hate speech" as you claimed; in fact, it had nothing to do with race at all. We do have a policy of not biting the newcomers. A simple level 1 uw-POV tag would have sufficed. Stonemason89 (talk) 21:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)