This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hunter Kahn (talk | contribs) at 15:32, 5 December 2010 (→Lets Have Episode of The (time frame)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:32, 5 December 2010 by Hunter Kahn (talk | contribs) (→Lets Have Episode of The (time frame))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Animation/South Park task force page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AFD for The Meteor Shower Trilogy
At Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Meteor Shower Trilogy. East of Borschov 12:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Updates to TV#MOS
I'm not sure how many people monitor WP:MOSTV or even WP:TV (the basic WikiProject for all of us), but we've been trying to get some feedback on additions to the TV Manual of Style. It largely has to do with the inclusion of "Overview" tables at the start of the page, the order in which season lists are presented (currently, there is no concrete order), and what is considered too much info for DVDs (i.e. should we be placing every detail about the box set in the article, from each interview to the aspect ratio, or should be keep it more generalized). Please see discussion at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
South Park articles have been selected for the Misplaced Pages 0.8 release
Version 0.8 is a collection of Misplaced Pages articles selected by the Misplaced Pages 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the South Park articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Misplaced Pages talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Misplaced Pages talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Misplaced Pages for Schools to extend the reach of Misplaced Pages worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!
For the Misplaced Pages 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
South Park
Something is wrong with the article, the navigation pane is about halfway down the page, and the Series overview section looks like someone messed up a table. Sephiroth storm (talk) 03:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed it . -- Cirt (talk) 03:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject cleanup listing
I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Lets Have Episode of The (time frame)
Let's have an episode every two weeks where we all work together to get it up to GA. I figure we could really get this project off the ground if we do that. Anyone else up for that? Or have another suggested time frame?--Iankap99 (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- There was an ongoing quality drive for articles that started a few seasons back, it seems to have done a really good job on newer articles. Older articles though haven't yet benefitted from that drive. How's about those with access to stronger Google-fu start on those? WikiuserNI (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
More than i quality drive, I'm suggesting a Good Article drive, getting articles up to good article standards. I suggest however, that we start on the best articles that aren't up to GA standards and work our way down. I'm not going to do this on my own, I would need a very committed partner, are you up for it?--Iankap99 (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please see WP:SOUTHPARK/TOPIC. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Iankap99, as the above users pointed out, what you are suggesting is largely what we were doing at the SP Topic Drive, which led to some real success with Seasons 1 and 13, but has been fairly inactive lately. I'd love to try to get it started again, so how about we try your GA-drive idea with season 2? We can work on those episodes, and try to get the good topics like the South Park (season 1) FT and the South Park (season 13) GT? — Hunter Kahn 01:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, but lets have 2 or 3 articles selected from those to be the ones of current emphasis. So that us three can know which ones to cooperate on. Pick them yourself, I have no preference. Sounds like a plan?--Iankap99 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- There are 3 articles claimed. Collaborating on those might be a good starting point. Nergaal (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, since those articles are already claimed and have been worked on a bit, I was thinking it would be better to work on some of the unclaimed articles, since they need the most attention. I thought we could start with "Cartman's Mom Is Still a Dirty Slut" and/or "Chickenlover", perhaps? — Hunter Kahn 15:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- There are 3 articles claimed. Collaborating on those might be a good starting point. Nergaal (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, but lets have 2 or 3 articles selected from those to be the ones of current emphasis. So that us three can know which ones to cooperate on. Pick them yourself, I have no preference. Sounds like a plan?--Iankap99 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)