Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Steven Levitt (2nd nomination) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Steven Taylor (talk | contribs) at 16:14, 24 February 2006 (let the community decide, rather than abusing process). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:14, 24 February 2006 by Steven Taylor (talk | contribs) (let the community decide, rather than abusing process)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Steven_Levitt

Non notable, not worthy of an encyclopedia entry. We can't possibly catalog every crackpot theorist and give them a platform for their asinine, out-of-touch "theories"

Speedy Keep. This afd sounds like a POV issue. Levitt clearly meets requirements of notability for an author. -Jcbarr 15:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Keep per Jcbarr. --D-Day 15:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Keep As much as I may disagree with some of the what the person may have to say, he is notable and I cannot stand with you on this. Misplaced Pages is for NPOV articles, not a soapbox for a viewpoint no matter how worthy.Coffeeboy 15:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I see no reason why this guy is not notable enough. After all, he seems to have a New York Times bestseller. Also, it doesn't look like the article especially propagates his theories. – Krun 16:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)