This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Active Banana (talk | contribs) at 00:04, 17 February 2011 (→Update needed to External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:04, 17 February 2011 by Active Banana (talk | contribs) (→Update needed to External links)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Erdős number in introduction
Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __meco (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. Kevin (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Why is his blog permitted as external link, but not his tweets?
- I don't see the difference. Perhaps there is some Misplaced Pages policy on this.
- Calamitybrook (talk)
(put above comment in proper order)
Update needed to External links
The external links need to be updated. Here is a suggested replacement:
- Hewitt's homepage.
- h at DBLP Bibliography Server
- List of publications from Hewitt's web page.
- Hewitt's blog.
- Hewitt's tweets
- Wittgenstein versus Gödel on the Foundations of Logic Stanford hour-long video with slides here on April 23, 2010 with participants including Solomon Feferman, Jeremy Forth, Grigori Mints, and Charles Petrie.
- How to Program the Many Cores for Inconsistency Robustness Stanford hour-long video with slides here on January 12, 2011 with participants including Dennis Allison, Douglas Crockford, and Andy Freeman.
171.66.86.58 (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Above suggestion looks okay to me, but there may be a few editors who seek to keep article (and even this talk page) in an unchanged condition. I suppose that's their "consensus."
- In fairness, a number of other editors have disagreed, and there are a practically infinite number of people who don't particularly care.
- Calamitybrook (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- The important issue is having a good encyclopedia article. 171.66.86.58 (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm with you. But considering that I stumbled on this article through a press listing of the "Dumbest disputes on Misplaced Pages" or something like that.... your goal may be difficult to achieve.
- Also, consider that the few eagle-editors involved here don't seem to cotton much to unregistered editors like yourself.
Calamitybrook (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Per WP:ELOFFICIAL we dont need to repost every one of Hewitts social networking sites - so I would definitely eliminate the Twitter and blog.
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Science and academia work group articles needing infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Biography articles without infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles