Talk:Carl Hewitt - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Calamitybrook (talk | contribs) at 01:07, 17 February 2011 (→Update needed to External links: cited policy sanctions links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:07, 17 February 2011 by Calamitybrook (talk | contribs) (→Update needed to External links: cited policy sanctions links)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Skip to table of contents

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

This article is the subject of an arbitration ruling. It is expected that editors abide by the letter and spirit of that ruling. Those editors who violate the ruling, but are unaware of it, will be informed of the details before any sanctions are invoked.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Archive 1

Erdős number in introduction

Do others agree with me that having someone's Erdős number in the introduction is awkward? __meco (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I agree. Maybe it should go in the bio section, with the names of those whose co-authorship earns him the number. On it's own it reads a bit like his shoe size, at least to someone unfamiliar with the term. Kevin (talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Why is his blog permitted as external link, but not his tweets?

I don't see the difference. Perhaps there is some Misplaced Pages policy on this.

Calamitybrook (talk)

(put above comment in proper order)

Update needed to External links

The external links need to be updated. Here is a suggested replacement:

Hewitt's homepage.
h at DBLP Bibliography Server
List of publications from Hewitt's web page.
Hewitt's blog.
Hewitt's tweets
Wittgenstein versus Gödel on the Foundations of Logic Stanford hour-long video with slides here on April 23, 2010 with participants including Solomon Feferman, Jeremy Forth, Grigori Mints, and Charles Petrie.
How to Program the Many Cores for Inconsistency Robustness Stanford hour-long video with slides here on January 12, 2011 with participants including Dennis Allison, Douglas Crockford, and Andy Freeman.

171.66.86.58 (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Above suggestion looks okay to me, but there may be a few editors who seek to keep article (and even this talk page) in an unchanged condition. I suppose that's their "consensus."

In fairness, a number of other editors have disagreed, and there are a practically infinite number of people who don't particularly care.

Calamitybrook (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

The important issue is having a good encyclopedia article. 171.66.86.58 (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I'm with you. But considering that I stumbled on this article through a press listing of the "Dumbest disputes on Misplaced Pages" or something like that.... your goal may be difficult to achieve.

Also, consider that the few eagle-editors involved here don't seem to cotton much to unregistered editors like yourself.

Calamitybrook (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Per WP:ELOFFICIAL we dont need to repost every one of Hewitts social networking sites - so I would definitely eliminate the Twitter and blog.

I definitely disagree with the implication that these links violate your cited policy. In fact, to the contrary, it says "Official links (if any) are provided to give the reader the opportunity to see what the subject says about itself."

"We don't need to" do anything. A particular editor sees fit to add these links and I have no problem with it, and so far as we've seen, doing so doesn't violate a Misplaced Pages policy or policies.

Calamitybrook (talk) 01:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Categories: