This is an old revision of this page, as edited by John Cline (talk | contribs) at 04:23, 3 April 2011 (→Your RfA: WP:NOTNOW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:23, 3 April 2011 by John Cline (talk | contribs) (→Your RfA: WP:NOTNOW)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Thanks for looking at my talk page - feel free to comment and i'll reply on this page, I am so busy editing that I probably won't be able to reply immedietly!
Your RfA
I saw it, and it's pretty unformatted. I hope you meant a second nomination for yourself, instead of User:Wikipedian2 2.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Reply on your own talk page please. I'm sorry, but I don't think you're ready yet, given your daily activity here. See WP:NOTNOW.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, thank-you for considering anyway. Wikipedian2 (talk) 04:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- I did notice your Rfa as well and began some preliminary checks that will occur, and I respect your ambition, but honesty fell I should alert you to the policy regarding early attempts which are not quite ready to be compared to expected criteria. Again, I respect ambition, but an administrator is expected to be well in tune with policy and consensus. The simple act of moving forward without full preparation and credential, will be a negative consideration, and there is not enough motivation and ambition to overcome that fact. Please consider this and believe me I am trying to tell you a thing you can almost expect, if you do go forward. Even the malformed RfA, will be used to demonstrate that now is not the right time for you to attempt this thing. IMHO. My76Strat (talk) 04:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)