Misplaced Pages

User talk:Radar33

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Radar33 (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 25 May 2011 (→Sorry for your leaving: responses). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:23, 25 May 2011 by Radar33 (talk | contribs) (→Sorry for your leaving: responses)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

 

If you came to my talk page:

  • Because I placed a {{user warning}} template on your / another user's talk page, and wish to comment on that action:
    Please click here to leave me a message, or click here to leave me a {{talkback}}/{{whisperback}} notice.
    • I don't usually watch pages that I leave warnings on.
  • To leave a {{user warning}} template on my talk page:
    Please don't; it will be removed immediately and without comment.
    Instead, please click here and leave a personalized message describing the issue you have.
  • Because I left you a message:
    Please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. I will continue watching it until the conversation is over.
    • Please do not leave {{talkback}} or {{whisperback}} messages for me here if I started the conversation, unless I have not answered you for several days and have been otherwise active.
  • Because you left a message for me somewhere else:
    Please click here to leave me a notice.
    • Replace {{REVISIONUSER}} with the name of the page the message was left at.
  • For some other reason not listed above:
    Please click here to leave me a new message.


If you leave me a message:

  • I will answer on my talk page (unless you request otherwise), then notify your talk page (unless I notice you are watching my page).
This talk page may be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query.
Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly (within 48 hours) is appreciated.
Archiving icon
Archives
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Whisperback notices

Close it

Please close the discussion at Talk:2010-2011 Ivorian crisis. After reading the comment made by Primecoordinator, I think Second Ivorian Civil War should be merged into 2010-2011 Ivorian Crisis. 19:05, 22 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by B-Machine (talk • contribs)

 Done – AJL 19:51, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, this is absurd. How many more misconceived and time-wasting merge proposals are you going to allow B-Machine to inflict? Have you seen his comment here? His attitude is just plain juvenile. Prioryman (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
This will be the last one. – AJL 08:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for your leaving

I feel very sorry for your leaving from helping resolving that name/title disputes. I am very grateful for your sincere and hard efforts there! Some treatments you encountered there is unfair and not in line with WP:Civil. I have less and less confidence in the environment of the dispute and mediation on that topic (the name/title). With all my best wishes to you! --Lvhis (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Me, too. I hope mediation will continue anyway. If not...I don't know what the next step is...I mean, I know what the two options are, but neither is particularly palatable. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Lvhis: Unfortunately, this was just one of the many, many, issues that needed to be addressed. It however happened to be the one that has come up the most often. If the rest of DR/mediation attempts for any of the other issues go this badly... Well, I'd rather not think about it. Thank you for the wishes, and good luck to you to.
  • Qwyrxian: The mediation may possibly continue (in about another year, given the slow progress of it currently). What are the two options you were thinking of? ArbCom is one (if you go that route, I would suggest focusing on the behavior of editors involved, not necessarily the content involved), or ANI (again, with the same suggestion, but with possibly less-dire consequences).
– AJL 23:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)