This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 05:27, 3 June 2011 (Signing comment by 69.165.151.52 - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:27, 3 June 2011 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by 69.165.151.52 - "")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Comics Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Belgium Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Chinese art
I think the "Ligne claire" style was inspired by Chinese art. If I'm correct, the article should make that clear.
- You may be correct, but I haven't found any evidence for it. Does anyone have any sources that might indicate this? I can see what Mr. 213... means by it, but I don't want to add this unless I am sure. Mikkel 05:31, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
It might be and the frienship of Hergé with Tchang may have played a role.... Ericd 17:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Geoff Darrow
When I merged this and Clean line style, I brought over a reference to Geoff Darrow. In his article, it says that his style is inspired by Japanese cartoons and 1950s americana. Which is correct? Ligne claire or the ones mentioned? Mikkel 05:31, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
- Whoo-hpph! Replying one year later, anyway, Ligne Claire is not exactly defined, but is classified vaguely as an art style with clear lines and spaces that is easily readable, and in those aspects aren't too different from common designs in both Japanese cartoons and 50's Americana. Personally, I think Geof Darrow's style could be a little too stuffed with details etc. to be real Ligne claire (Even more so than his cited inspirations). 惑乱 分からん 23:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- His style was already developed by then. In his earlier work, he did have a rougher style. From the Chinese art that I've seen (and I've seen a lot), it is certainly not all like that simple, clear style. I doubt there's any influence. The Chinese didn't do everything first, despite what they'd like us to believe. 70.50.55.217 15:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Images?
Wouldn't adding some images to bits such as this one
Contemporary use of the ligne claire is often ironic. For example, van de Boogaart used the simple, clear style to set up a conflict with the amorality of his characters,
help illustrate what the editor is trying to say? CatBoris 16:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I guess he means that the style in Tintin etc. is considered somewhat sweet and innocent, nowadays, and therefore newer artists often make use of the style ironically with deliberate notions of ambiguity. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * 16:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Webcomics
Is the Perry Bible Fellowship's fairly frequent use of ligne-claire worth mentioning? It usually makes the shortlist of best-webcomics, and also continues to have widespread popularity in spite of the author being lazy and updating once per whenever he feels like it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.192.87 (talk) 13:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a "typical example". There are better examples out there. 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Strong colors
Hmm, the phrase "strong colors" actually seems slightly half-true. The classic ligne claire series such as "Tintin" and "Blake and Mortimer" mostly has a rather subdued and slightly matte color scheme. It's colorful, but it's not as garish as some American comics from the same period, and gradients are basically non-existent. Scott McCloud wrote something about this in his color chapter in "Understanding Comics". Compare the Tintin image in the article. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2011_March_28#File:General alcazar.jpg
Check WP:NFCC. All opinions welcome. Thank you. victor falk 19:13, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Steve Rolston
Canadian artist Steve Rolston could/should be mentioned. Warren Ellis called him an "ascended master" of the style (http://twitter.com/#!/warrenellis/statuses/73736413568450560) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.151.52 (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Categories: