This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spitfire (talk | contribs) at 07:08, 9 June 2011 (close). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:08, 9 June 2011 by Spitfire (talk | contribs) (close)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Seksen iki yüz kırk beş
Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Seksen iki yüz kırk beş/Archive.
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
03 June 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 85.103.129.110 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
This IP address actually claims that they are not Seksen iki yüz kırk beş in their edits and appears to be more WP:DUCK. Probably from another PC and it probably isn't worth running checkuser. Nipsonanomhmata 09:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Yes, it definitely is from another PC, one from Mersin as Seksen iki yüz kırk beş has told, the other three IP's are from İstanbul, which are all mine. I have made my case in the talk page of the IP 78.176.91.37 User_talk:78.176.91.37. By the way, I did not know that somebody having the user name Seksen iki yüz kırk beş exists in the world until a few days ago when I was reading the Cyprus article. So he is not me and is not even somebody I know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.103.129.110 (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- The problem is that you are behaving exactly like Seksen. See WP:DUCK. If you are genuinely an unconnected person then you should wait a few weeks before editing in the wake of his edit-warring behaviour. If you are an unconnected person then you are behaving like a WP:MEATPUPPET which is just as bad if not worse than a WP:SOCKPUPPET. If you are genuinely unconnected you need to know that you are making things worse for Seksen. If the socketpuppetry and meatpuppetry continues then Seksen and all associated IP addresses will be banned indefinitely. You are not doing him a favor. You are condemning him. Nipsonanomhmata 12:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
I am not trying to make anybody favor or disfavor, I merely and repetitively say that I am not the said editor, nor have any affiliation with that person. In fact, I simply followed editor Nipsonanomhmata's edits, which led me to the specifis articles where he and the user Seksen iki yüz kırk beş both are edit-warring. As I reverted what I consider to be Nipsonanomhmata 's disruptive unilateral deletions of sourced information I have been accused of sockpuppetry, for insance here and here , merely because Seksen iki yüz kırk beş was just doing the same. --85.103.129.110 (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
No it is not. WP:STALKING article says that stalking consitutes following an editor "in order to repeatedly confront or inhibit their work". I am editing just for a few days in total and mostly to revert the disruptive deletions of the editor Nipsonanomhmata, which can hardly be called a "work" in the first place. I am reverting what he deletes from wikipedia, not what he adds to it. Plus, I do not follow that user as a person, there are definitely better things to do in life than to follow an extremist nationalist. In this respect, WP:STALKING also says that: "Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing errors or violations of Misplaced Pages policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.103.129.110 (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I have never thought calling an extremist nationalist as an extremist nationalist constitutes a "personal attack". I am not going to do that from now on. Would that be offesive too if I call him an "Angel of Peace"? Alright, I would not be using any personal adjectives at all.--85.103.129.110 (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Per WP:DUCK I've blocked the IP for two weeks, and have blocked the master for 1 month for evasion. — HelloAnnyong 15:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Clerk note: Actually, I'm relisting this for a checkuser. This case is now being discussed at ANI as well, on the grounds that all of these IPs I've blocked recently may not be connected to the master. I know that we don't usually connect IPs to accounts, but I'm listing to try to get to the bottom of this issue. If the issue is not reporting the results publicly, then maybe they can be emailed or something. Either way, I think we need a checkuser to clarify the situation. — HelloAnnyong 17:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
- Clerk note: So.. it's been four days, and the ANI thread has been archived... — HelloAnnyong 12:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Declined File this one under WP:DUCK, HelloAnnoying. No point in matching IPs to prove a point when they can be blocked. Keegan (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Clerk note: IP is blocked, so nothing further to do here. Spitfire 07:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Categories: