This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Essjay (talk | contribs) at 14:27, 12 March 2006 (→[] and []: Move to talk page; the request is not valid, but the discussion is). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:27, 12 March 2006 by Essjay (talk | contribs) (→[] and []: Move to talk page; the request is not valid, but the discussion is)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
due to a shortage of available mediators and an increased number of requests. New requests will be accepted and assigned as mediators become available. Parties should be aware that there may be a significant delay in having a mediator assigned. Individuals interested in joining the committee should see the Committee page. |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header
New Requests
New requests should be listed at the top of this section, right below this message. All requests must use the {{RFMR}} template. Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Guide provides an explaination for how to file a request; Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Sample shows the template with instructions. All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected. A description of common reasons for rejecting requests is available at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Common Reasons for Rejection.
Important note: Any request that fails to include all the information required by the {{RFMR}} format will be delisted immediately. Any request that includes additional information, particularly commentary, will have the additional information removed. Parties should adhere to the format strictly.
Natural selection
Involved parties
- Marcosantezana (talk · contribs)
- KimvdLinde (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- WP:RFC
- Extended discussions at the talk page, with repeated request to join the discussions to find consensus.
- Limited 'discussion' at user talk pages.
- WP:AN under Advise needed.
Issues to be mediated
- General outline of the article.
Additional issues to be mediated
- None
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. KimvdLinde 08:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. ~~~~
- Do not agree. ~~~~
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept/Reject/Extend:
- For the Mediation Committee, ~~~~
Machsom Watch
Involved parties
- Zero0000 (talk · contribs)
- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg (talk · contribs)
- Ynhockey (talk · contribs)
- Zeq (talk · contribs)
- Babajobu (talk · contribs)
- Pecher (talk · contribs)
- Heptor (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:
- Article talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AMachsom_Watch&diff=42934024&oldid=42923140
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
Discussions on article talk page and requestes on user talk page.
Issues to be mediated
- NPOV policy 1: Should the article 1st paragrpah contain both POVs on the issue of Human Rights (as it has to do with Checkpoints and the broader issues of human rights to both Palestinians and Israelis) ?
- NPOV policy 2: Should the contraversy be Described ?
- NPOV policy 3: Are quotes from the oragnization own web site should be a source for Misplaced Pages article ?
Additional issues to be mediated
- To be completed
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. ] 07:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree -Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 07:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Pecher 17:18, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. -- Y Ynhockey Y 17:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, not interested in participating. I once restored some information Zero removed, but it seems that it is back into the article now, even with better wording. As long as he agrees not to remove information again, I'll skip this one. -- Heptor talk 23:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)I read the discussion and reconsidered. I agree to participate in mediation (To make it clear: I was originally not interested in the article alltogether, not just the mediation part. After reading the talk page, I now think it is worth while anyway) -- Heptor talk 23:24, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Note: As with the above mediation, the previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. Essjay 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Al-Sarafand
Involved parties
- Zero0000 (talk · contribs)
- banned user Alberuni (talk · contribs) who helped zero using anon IP 68.214.35.104
- Zeq (talk · contribs)
User Ramallite was involved but not directly since he was actually a fair 3rd party that asked questions about my edits and received answers after which he did not change the article. I assume that if he still have doubts about accuracy we will hear from him.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3AZero0000&diff=42934322&oldid=42934214
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
The issue is small and simple. So the steps taken are:
- Review by 3rd party (who asked very good questions about the sources provided)
- Requests (to Zero) that he:
- Avoid reverts and edit wars
- Discuss each of his reverts in talk page of article. ( this is realy a cardinal request, as zero ignore talk too often when he reverts )
- Do not remove relavant sourced content based on judicial process
- Adheer to NPOV policy
Issues to be mediated
- Should the article contain both version about the issue i.e Only the one from the Islamic movment prepective or also to add the fact from the judicial comitee who investigated the issue.
Additional issues to be mediated
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. ] 07:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Note: The previous state of the issues section was unacceptable. Issues must be presented in a bulleted list, without commentary or accusations. The section must be completed in the correct format or the request will be rejected. Essjay 11:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)