This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Iadrian yu (talk | contribs) at 13:37, 11 July 2011 (→Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:37, 11 July 2011 by Iadrian yu (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Nmate
Nmate (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Nmate/Archive.
11 July 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Buhuhu (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Hobartimus (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Baxter9 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I noticed edit of newly formed account User:Buhuhu and I partially reverted it, but my edit was then instantly reverted by User:Nmate and, therefore, I suspect that User:Buhuhu is an sockpuppet of User:Nmate. Behavior of User:Nmate looked suspicious to me in the past too and edits of this account are pretty much corresponding with edits of two other accounts (User:Hobartimus and User:Baxter9). All these accounts are helping each other in revert warring in various articles and here is an concrete example: Account User:Baxter9 was not active from 23 August 2010 to 10 March 2011 and in that date (10 March 2011) it was activated to help User:Hobartimus in his revert warring with User:Iaaasi: , . Also, it is evident that User:Nmate and User:Hobartimus are often editing same articles and helping one another in revert warring, for example here: . Also, knowing that all these accounts are describing themselves as Hungarian, it is very strange that most of their edits are related to Slovakia and not to Hungary: , , (most edits of User:Hobartimus are not related to Slovakia, but Slovakia-related subjects are highly positioned in his edit count and his first edit was in Slovakization article: ). Finally, they all might be sockpuppets of banned User:VinceB who was blocked because of socpuppetry in 4 April 2007 and one of last articles that he edited was Slovakization article, which is also first article edited by User:Hobartimus. Having in mind fact that User:VinceB was blocked because of sockpuppetry in 4 April 2007 and that all these accounts having similar pattern of behavior like user User:VinceB and that all of them were created after User:VinceB was blocked (Hobartimus - 27 May 2007, Nmate - 25 September 2007, Baxter9 - 13 May 2007) there should be socpuppetry investigation about this case. I am surprised that nobody conducted this investigation after original account of User:VinceB was blocked. PANONIAN 12:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC) PANONIAN 12:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Some time ago I wanted to make a similar report but but I guess user Panonian beat me to it :). I also believe that there is some connection here, with the exclusion of user Hobartimus and Buhuhu (my opinion because Hobartimus does not follow that pattern and I don`t know anything about Buhuhu). There is definitely something wrong here because some of the mentioned users work to synchronized, like a team. I also suspect that user:Nmate`s account was taken over by somebody else because this person learned to speak advanced English in a matter of days. I also saw some examples where he could`t have a simple conversation. Links for bad English: ; ; ; and in a very short time he "learned" advanced English,(not by userboxes info but by talking to him). In a short period of time his English improved dramatically. Anyway I also suspect that these users are connected somehow if no sockpuppets are involved. I hope that this case will shower some light on all this.Adrian (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: