Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of populated places in Serbia

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dr. Blofeld (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 11 July 2011 (moved Talk:List of cities, towns and villages in Serbia to Talk:List of populated places in Serbia). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:30, 11 July 2011 by Dr. Blofeld (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:List of cities, towns and villages in Serbia to Talk:List of populated places in Serbia)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconSerbia List‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Database

This list is semi-automatically (export/lots of text macros/lots of manual disambiguation) generated from a MS Access 2003 database, made by myself from census data 2002. If anyone is interested in playing with it, it can be downloaded from my personal web site; it should reasonably match the contents of this list (as of 2 August 2007) (since I had to add disambiguators manually in both the text and the database, there might be certain deviations). The database contains only settlement, municipality, population, postal number data. Duja► 11:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Merged back

I understand that the list is on the longish side, but splitting the article in two made it less navigable: if one needs an item in (N-Z) part, he would have to 1) parse the lead to find the link 2) click on it and wait for the page to load. On average, that makes access slower than having to wait just one list to load, and overall more inconvenient. I think that 140 kB of text is quite manageable both for readers and editors, and it's much easier to find the information this way. No such user (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Categories: