Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanished user 24kwjf10h32h (talk | contribs) at 02:24, 23 July 2011 (→Quiltro: er, I never assumed bad baith... well, as Bohlen said: "do what you want, be what you are..." the rest of the song may sound strange...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Quiltro

Quiltro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quiltro is a term used to describe a mixed-breed dog in Chile and Bolivia, and the article is just a definition and list of trivia. I've already added mention of this term to the article mixed-breed dog. It should be noted that "quiltro" is a redirect to "mixed-breed dog" on the Spanish Misplaced Pages -- if they're not keeping a standalone page about it, even though the countries in question would fall under their scope, it makes very little sense for us to do so. Even if that's not a reason to change it to a redirect on this project, it's worth thinking about.

If this was a specific type of mix, a la potcake dog or sato, I wouldn't be nominating it; however, many countries have their own terms for the generic mixed-breed dog and they don't all need separate pages. Anna 01:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

• In fact, I created the article when there was content on the word and it was called Quiltro (it has since been moved to Perro mestizo), from a version like this. Move whatever necessary to Mixed breed dog, and redirect. -- Diego  talk  01:39, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
• Delete as per policy. LiteralKa (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Oh, it's you and your wikilawyering.  Diego  talk  02:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I would caution you to be civil. LiteralKa (talk) 02:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
      • LOL, how can that be uncivil?  Diego  talk  02:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
        • Well for one, I didn't say it wasn't. It is, however, the type of comment that eventually degrades into incivility. Second, you immediately assumed bad faith. Third, citing policy is not "utilizing the rules in a manner contrary to their principles." LiteralKa (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
          • I've no interest in involving myself in an useless discussion with you. kthxbai.  Diego  talk  02:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Not yet sorted)
• AfD debates