This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) at 03:42, 24 July 2011 (→You are banned from pseudoscience and chiropractic for one year, per the AE discussion: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:42, 24 July 2011 by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) (→You are banned from pseudoscience and chiropractic for one year, per the AE discussion: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)ArbCom
I will be filing a request for enforncement of sanctions, under Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Pseudoscience#Discretionary_sanctions, in regards to the recent disruptive edits against consensus. DigitalC (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- It has been filed here DigitalC (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Please respond at WP:AE
See this comment and invitation. The three named problems at chiropractic, pseudoscience and vertebral artery dissection could reach a negotiated result at AE if you will participate. You sometimes fail to appear when your conduct is being reviewed, as in WP:Requests for comment/QuackGuru and the WP:AESH case. Please don't do so this time. EdJohnston (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
You are banned from pseudoscience and chiropractic for one year, per the AE discussion
Please see the result of this AE thread. You are banned from the topics of pseudoscience and chiropractic, broadly construed, for one year. If you believe that the sanction is not warranted you may appeal it to me, to WP:Arbitration enforcement using the {{Arbitration enforcement appeal}} template or to Arbcom directly. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)