This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andering J. REDDSON (talk | contribs) at 01:19, 20 August 2011 (→{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|Requests for clarification|Requests for clarification}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:19, 20 August 2011 by Andering J. REDDSON (talk | contribs) (→{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification|Requests for clarification|Requests for clarification}})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Open cases| Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requests| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ] | none | none | 19 August 2011 |
| ] | none | none | 20 August 2011 |
| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Arbitrator workflow motions | 10 January 2025 |
Requests for clarification
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification/Header
Request for clarification: WP:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names
Initiated by Fmph (talk) at 19:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:
- Fmph (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (initiator)
Statement by Fmph
Can I direct ArbCom's attention to the first motion in this case. It states that "... no page moves shall be initiated for a period of 2 years" and that ruling is in force until September 18, 2011. Can ArbCom please clarify what they expect to happen on the 18th September?
There have been continued 'suggestions' over the last 23 months that the articles should be moved. So the issue has not gone away. I have made a suggestion (in response to a question as to whether the prohibition should be extended) as to what should happen. If ArbCom think its not a bad idea, perhaps they would like to endorse it, or something like it?
I will notify the project that I have opened this clarification.
Statement by other user
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Arbitrator views and discussion
Request for mediation: “Non-Lethal Weap” page;
Initiated by A REDDSON at 01:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)19 August 2011
List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:
- Template:Andering J. REDDSON (initiator)
- Template:Berean Hunter
- Template:Binksternet
- Template:Marcus Qwertyus
Statement by Andering J. REDDSON
I am requestion mediation on “Non-Lethal Weap” specifically against
⋙–Berean–Hunter—►. I have attempted to remove a source from the page; Specifically, that Amnesty Amnesty International is considered biased by Misplaced Pages itself, yet is quoted as a “reputable source.” Binksternet even said “Amnesty International is biased, of course, but they are a reliable source.”
Bear with me if I did this wrong, but I’m actually not sure how to do this. (For example I already know that my username links are broken, but I just can’t seem to figure out how to fix them.)
Statement by other user
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).