Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) at 01:01, 2 September 2011 (→Terms of unblock: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Index • edit List of archives by month December 2006 to March 2007 March 2007 to early May 2007 Early May 2007 to mid-June 2007 End of June 2007 All archives beyond this point are done automatically by bot. Any threads that are five days old will be archived to the appropriate one of the following exciting subpages, for your enjoyment: July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 Threads only need be two days old from this point on to be archived. November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March (and end of Feb.) 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 + the end of May July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May and the end of April 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011

My pontificality of prelates

Terms of unblock

Further to our conversation by email, I'm about to change the settings of your block to expire at 19:02 (UTC), 2 September 2011 (which is about 19 hours from now). The conditions for this are:

• The reinstatement of your previous agreement with Xeno (to explain actions in edit summaries, and not to refer to legitimate scrutiny as harassment)
• A prohibition on redirecting or tagging for speedy or proposed deletion any article related to Doctor Who. You may still use AfD, but are cautioned against nominating articles that have little realistic chance of being deleted.
• A requirement that you clearly explain your rationale for any revert in your edit summary and an encouragement to make use of dispute resolution processes as an alternative to repeated reverts. Your own userspace and edits that any reasonable editor would agree constitute vandalism are excepted.
• A requirement that any allegations of misconduct you wish to make be made on a relevant noticeboard and nowhere else (and in particular not in edit summaries)
• Violation of these restrictions will lead to blocks of escalating duration: starting with one week, then proceeding to one month and so on. This does not impede administrators from taking what they believe to be appropriate action arising from conduct that does not fall under these restrictions.
• These restrictions will be reviewed on or shortly after 1 January 2012 and likely lifted if there are no significant problems in the meantime. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

• And because it's 2am and I can't be bothered with the markup to make it exactly 19:02, you've got three minutes free. Don't let me down, TreasuryTag—I've stuck my neck out for you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:01, 2 September 2011 (UTC)