Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Night w (talk | contribs) at 19:17, 15 October 2011 (revert silliness). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Recognitions

Hi, thanks for your message. I now see your point, perhaps the text could say "exceeds 130" as that's consistent with most of the sources we have now. Apparently the number is changing rapidly. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

By sources do you mean Mansour? The PLO itself has given an official figure of 127, and most sources in the article (news articles and political figures) either agree with that figure or echo it. Mansour is a mystery. Nightw 14:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

I mean sources concerning the view of the PLO representative, which is what the snippet in the lead discusses. Of course, whether the view of the PLO rep is the right one to use in the lead is another question. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 10:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Second poll

No problem, Night, you may call me as much times as needed. I want to participate in this, specially when it is guided so pleasantly. All best! --WhiteWriter 16:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Article Incubator/Zola Levitt

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Article Incubator/Zola Levitt. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:WHS divs.png

Thanks for uploading File:WHS divs.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Second Poll

Hi Night W, Thanks for letting me know about the poll. Munci (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Thomas de Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk

See Talk:Thomas de Mowbray, 1st Duke of Norfolk for answers to your question about the Lacy family. Also, I agree with you on the points made in the ancestry section. Either you or I can fix the table as it is not correct. -- Lady Meg (talk) 02:34, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- and it looks terrible with all the clutter of coat of arms. -- Lady Meg (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2011 (UTC)