This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kiftaan (talk | contribs) at 20:32, 22 December 2011 (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:32, 22 December 2011 by Kiftaan (talk | contribs) (→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Jigglyfidders
Jigglyfidders (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Jigglyfidders/Archive.
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
21 December 2011
- Suspected sockpuppets
- PassaMethod (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 124.168.140.62 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
A lot of overlaps between PassaMethod and Jigglyfidders here.
- Jigglyfidders was blocked for "persistent disruptive editing over cited Islam population statistics" by lowering the percent of Sunnis to 75% , even falsifying it to 70%
- User:Iwanttoeditthissh (sock of Jigglyfidders) proceeded with the same activity in the same article , citing a very unreliable source. http://terrorism.about.com/od/islampolitics/g/Sunni.htm
- PassaMethod chose the same activity in the same article , and argues very hard on the matter.
- Iwanttoeditthissh adds Bahá'í Faith in Australia to the Sydney article , and the above ip (124.168.140.62) which traces to the Sydney area was used by Jigglyfidders to edit his talk page but the same ip also wrote this to Jigglyfidders at another talk page.Kiftaan (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk declined - The master and any socks are very stale at this point, so there's nothing to run a CU on. — HelloAnnyong 05:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Can you run it on Smkolins (talk · contribs)? He started this and has edited the entire article.--Kiftaan (talk) 14:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- PassaMethod never edited that Bahai article, so I'm not sure why you think the two named accounts are connected. CU won't connect an IP to an account. And Smkolins has more than 18000 edits and is in good standing, so running a check solely based on a whim isn't going to happen. — HelloAnnyong 15:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, but I have psychic powers, lol. As my requests are being rejected I become more suspecious. I have a feeling that PassaMethod is Smkolins and Ian.thomson (talk · contribs) but if nobody wants to run a CU then there isn't much I can do.--Kiftaan (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- PassaMethod never edited that Bahai article, so I'm not sure why you think the two named accounts are connected. CU won't connect an IP to an account. And Smkolins has more than 18000 edits and is in good standing, so running a check solely based on a whim isn't going to happen. — HelloAnnyong 15:21, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Categories: