Misplaced Pages

Re: Battle of Vukovar TFAR

Yep, I know, I'm tracking it all. Thanks again :) --Joy (talk) 08:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

You're fast :) --Joy (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say you did an amazing job with the article, and thank you for all your hard work :). --71.202.63.69 (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Toilet god

Hello! Your submission of Toilet god at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HurricaneFan25 18:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

BTW, great article :P HurricaneFan25 18:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Port an Eilean Mhòir ship burial

Cyrus Cylinder

Hello Prioryman, First off, let me thank you for some of the fine work that you’ve done on making the Cyrus Cylinder page (particularly in your retitles, on the history of its discovery, the dispute between IRI and the British Museum , as well as the Exhibition in Iran update).

I am concerned, however, that your edits on 08:29, 2011 November 5‎ Prioryman (talk | contribs)‎ (89,345 bytes), are not quite what I consider useful. In particular, what seems to be opinionated viewpoints. Example: “However, the Cylinder's account of Cyrus's conquest clearly does not tell the whole story. Although the Persians do seem to have entered Babylon without serious resistance, the text does not mention the preceding Battle of Opis, in which Cyrus's forces defeated and apparently massacred Nabonidus's army.”

1) It reads far too much as if there was subterfuge afoot in the creation of the Cylinder as if the Cylinder was create to mislead. 2) There is no evidence that Cyrus’s army ever MASSACARED Nabodinus’s army. In fact, the historical evidence is that Cyrus was benign by ancient and modern standards in terms of the invasion. 3) The three historians being cited are opining (however educated their opinions may be), not definitively stating, that the cylinder did not tell the whole story.

To tell you the truth, I think that the whole section on the analysis of the cylinder’s claim is really not useful and subject to biases in terms of what analyses are included. There are very little articles on wikipedia referencing proclamations and announcement (declarations of independence, the magna carta, etc) that analyze the claims of those proclamations. Perhaps it might be better to remove the section altogether.

This being said, I am going to make some revisions addressing my concerns. Best, GoetheFromm (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Toilet god

Evidence

Do I put my responses to your allegations in the same section which you have written or another? The Last Angry Man (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

No, Mark, you need to wait until it's posted as a sockpuppet investigation - then you get to have your say. Prioryman (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Battle of Vukovar

This is a note to let the main editors of Battle of Vukovar know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 18, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/November 18, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Battle of Vukovar was an 87-day siege of the Croatian town of Vukovar by the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) and paramilitaries from Serbia, between August–November 1991. In 1990, Croatian Serb separatists launched an armed uprising, supported by Serbian President Slobodan Milošević, and seized control of Serb-populated areas of Croatia. The JNA intervened in favour of the Croatian Serbs and launched an offensive in August 1991 against Croatian government-held territory. Vukovar was defended by around 1,800 lightly armed Croatian soldiers and civilian volunteers, against 36,000 JNA soldiers and Serbian paramilitaries equipped with heavy armour and artillery. When the town fell on 18 November 1991 after prolonged fighting, hundreds were massacred by Serb forces and the town's non-Serb population was expelled. Vukovar was peacefully reintegrated into Croatia in 1998 after the end of the Croatian War of Independence and has since been rebuilt, but deep ethnic divisions remain. Several Serb military and political officials, including Milošević, were later indicted and in some cases jailed for war crimes committed during and after the battle. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Good work!

• - Yes, fantastic, quality work - well done. - Off2riorob (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you both. Prioryman (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Archiving Battle of Vukovar talk page?

Sure, done. --Joy (talk) 13:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

Questions to Arbs

I have sent you the other day an email with quack quack evidence. Can you please firstly confirm that you have received it.

Additionally, as I mentioned at User_talk:Russavia#Your_query I have asked individual arbs who are running for re-election to the Committee specific questions in relation to the Clarification request that they have so far basically ignored in providing straight answers for. You will find the questions, and their answers, on the individual candidacy pages.

I don't think it is fair only to subject those Arbs seeking re-election to such questions, and am thinking of asking individual arbs the same questions on their talk pages, to see if they will answer them, and I will make a note of their responses (or lack thereof) at their future candicacy.

Anyway, just wanted to give you a heads up in case you want to check out the questions and their answers in relation to this case. Russavia 14:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Silverdale Hoard

Lancaster Old Town Hall

I've created it as a redirect, and added it to the dab page at Old Town Hall. PamD 20:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Good idea, thanks for doing that. By the way, I've nominated the article for DYK, so you should see a DYK credit on your user talk page in the next few days. Prioryman (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy Christmas

Merry Christmas and best wishes! GregorB (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Merry Xmas!

--Tomobe03 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas and a happy new year!

DYK for Lancaster City Museum

• Thanks for expanding, and DYK-ing, the stub I started. After some Christmas travelling I might have a go at Lancaster Maritime Museum! PamD 08:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Regarding "Shivdeep Lande"

Hai Prioryman,

Mr.Shivdeep lande is one of the Indian Police service (IPS) officer. No other encyclopedia had biography about Shivdeep lande. Thats why, http://en.wikipedia.org/Shivdeep_lande This page is important.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahamed5zal (talk • contribs) 12:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hey man, have a very merry Christmas! All the best! Timbouctou (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Lagan Canal

Thanks for the kind words about the Lagan Canal article. I was working on Robert Whitworth, noted that he assessed the plans for the Lagan, then noted that the wikilink to it was red, so found there was no article, and thought there should be. Hope the DYK goes well. Bob1960evens (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you too. --Joy (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Adele Goodman Clark DYK review

I redid the article with inline citations - is everything good to go now? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Račak massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass killing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Meridian 5

DYK nomination of Lagan Canal

Hello! Your submission of Lagan Canal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year

A barnstar for you!

DYK for Lagan Canal

DYK for Jack Doran

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Croatian independence referendum, 1991, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Slavonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Norwegian butter crisis

Thank you, Prioryman! (-: — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Four Counties Ring

DYK for Ferdynand Goetel

DYK for Yellala Falls

DYK for Portland Fire Station No. 7

DYK for Nelson W. Fisk

DYK for Léon Azéma

Hallaton Helmet

Just a quick note to say thanks for the great improvements to Hallaton Helmet you added. A much improved article - worthy of submission for 'Did you know' IMHO. Cheers Londonclanger (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Baluarte Bridge

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Bunkers in Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valbona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Tablet of Shamash

Thanks a lot, it was fast and it's exactly what I wanted (we can see clearly the god and the symbols). Zunkir (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

No problem, happy to help! Prioryman (talk) 19:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Hallaton Helmet

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Spa Road railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Eastern Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bunkers in Albania

Blocked 27.100.16.185

Yep, I was just getting to that after rev deleting the page history. Thanks, The Helpful One 17:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Sinking of the RMS Titanic has been promoted to GA

Thank you for nominating Sinking of the RMS Titanic for Good Article, and for being prepared to work through all the suggestions that were put forward during the GA Review. I have promoted the article to GA and listed it at Misplaced Pages:Good articles/Engineering and technology#Maritime transport.

You are now qualified to volunteer to do GA reviews of articles that are nominated for GA status! Regards, Dolphin (t) 22:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: DYK nomination of Sisingamangaraja XII

Thanks for expanding the article. Sorry for my bad grammar. I want to add infobox to it. Which kind of infobox should I use? αδζ ψακ φρψερ 00:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem. It looks like Template:Infobox officeholder might be the most appropriate. Prioryman (talk) 07:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Barnes Cemetery

Danish sculpture DYK

Please see my slightly modified suggestion at Template:Did you know nominations/Danish sculpture. Thanks also for your positive comments on the article and your additions from Nelson. - Ipigott (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Lydd Town DYK

Hi, I've replied to your review of my nomination. Thanks for the comments! Del_♉sion23 (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK

Left you a note at Template:Did you know nominations/Ladies Memorial Association. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

National Helmet Week 2012

Sorry, I forget to say thanks. I'm told that the crosby might have looked liked that before the restoration Victuallers (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Eston Railway Station

Hi Prioryman! I've had a quick scan through your page about the Eston Railway Station - looking good! I've just linked Eston Hills to Eston Nab. I wrote the Eston Nab page because it had been hijacked by the company that transmits from the mast there. Perhaps I should have called the page Eston Hills. Best wishes, Francis Hannaway 21:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! As it happens, I was already writing an article about the Eston Hills to fill that particular gap. I've just posted a draft for you to see, at User:Prioryman/Eston Hills. It's some way from completion though. I'll probably merge your Eston Nab page into that, if you have no objections. Prioryman (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, I think you might like the hook I've come up with for the "did you know" nomination for Eston railway station - see Template:Did you know nominations/Eston railway station... Prioryman (talk) 21:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Spa Road railway station

A barnstar for you!

Titanic FAC

Fixed a few tiny things. Best of luck. If you want a hand, let me know. Would love to see it on the main page for the 100th anniversary. Steven Zhang 10:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

National Maritime Museum

Just dropping you a line about your Titanic microgrant - you mention the National Maritime Museum - I have a contact there who is interested in Misplaced Pages stuff, happy to put you in touch if you think there would be any value in that! Drop me an email if you like. Regards, The Land (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Sinking of the RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RMS Mauretania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Kaali Sudheer

I have visiting the Muse Art gallery in Hyderabad and i have attended all the art events curated by Kaali sudheer. He is doing a fantastic community service in the areas of Art . helping the budding, young, women artists to show case their talent and build their careers in the art . i spoke to him in length and understood that we need to have a wikipedia page for him so that it will be of use for Artists who want to show their works and get benefited. As the gallery is a not to profit started by a big name like Marriott and Marriott have partnered with kaali sudheer. Thought it will be of great use for artists around the world to use this wonderful space and show their talent. I have given the external links of well known sources like US consulate of Hyderabad , Confederation of Indian Industry ( CII) , Yahoo News and well known news papers Hindu and postnoon etc. I do not agree with your deletion as In India Esp in south India there is hardly any art appreciation. there are very few art galleries in Hyderabad and that too all galleries are commercial one. Kaali sudheer has stated this to promote artists supported by Marriott. Kaali Sudheer has been doing a good work in the area of art. i object your decision for deletion pleas http://www.hybiz.tv/Kaali-Sudheer--MUSE-Art-Gallery/165227 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregx1872 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

What on earth are you talking about? I've had nothing to do with any deletion requests about this person. Prioryman (talk) 19:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Harmondsworth Great Barn

Thanks!

Thankyou for your barnstar and your kind words. Pleased you appreciate the effort that went into it. Best regards.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Another picture for the Meermin…?

Hello Prioryman, thanks again for the wonderful job you did of retrieving the illustration of a ship from Groenewegen, Gerrit (1789), Verzameling van vier en tachtig stuks Hollandsche schepen, for the Meermin slave mutiny article. I've been looking around for more images, and was pointed (here) to this picture: judging by the caption, it looks certain that this image is from the same source as the other one! It looks to me like it's another angle on the same type of ship, too. Thing is, the Meermin slave mutiny article is presently slated for a Main Page appearance on Saturday: if there's a chance that we could get that image by then, obviously that would be fab! Any thoughts? No worries if not! :o) Nortonius (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

No chance of getting it before Saturday, unfortunately, but it should be possible for me to get hold of it on Saturday morning. Prioryman (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

That would be wonderful, if you can: I don't think there'd be a problem in adding an image to the article while it's on the Main Page… Brilliant, thank you so much, I'll be watching for any update on Saturday– but again, no worries if it doesn't work out, thanks for taking it on! :o) Nortonius (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Superb– thank you so much! :D Nortonius (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Sinking of the Titanic

Thanks for adding the connection between pack ice and extremely calm seas. When I read the witness' statement that the stars could be seen reflected in the sea, I thought, Strange. I never saw that in all those years at sea. This explains it. I was never near pack ice. Thanks for all your good work and openness. Rumiton (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, I gather it's unusual even so. Ernest Shackleton, the Arctic explorer, testified at the British enquiry that he had only seen such conditions on a handful of occasions during his career. Prioryman (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

I think I spent quite a few more years than Shackleton did, staring at the blue stuff through bridge windows, but mostly in lower latitudes. I don't doubt the theory is correct. Thanks again. Rumiton (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Lonesomehurst Cabin

Thanks for the approval! If you don't mind you could check off that article (#19 of 729) in Misplaced Pages:Contributor copyright investigations/PumpkinSky, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

CCI is over, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Titanic

Oh yeah sorry, I forgot to comment on the public outrage stuff. I really like it, I think it's really interesting and enhances the page. I hope you like it too, and didn't only do it for my sake! I did indicate on the FAC page that "I'm not really qualified to fully support" (because I'm very new there), but I will add a comment that it gets my support if applicable. Fantastic work on the page, it looks like a surefire for promotion and that is just great. I think the only thing it needs now is an image review (it has enough supports for promotion already, I'm sure). I may actually be able to help out there, I ended up pretty knowledgable about copyright in the course of preparing my own FAC. But again, it depends on whether the delegates will "trust" me or not. I just took a look at all of them and I think you should be okay, although a couple of them need US licensing tags, as well as UK/EU ones (images need to be PD in both the US and the country of origin). You may also be challenged over whether or not they were all definitely published in the US before 1923, but seeing as the sinking was a huge deal there I think it's safe to assume they were. --Lobo (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Aw that's a nice thing to say, you're very welcome. I can't wait to see it featured on the main page! It's going to be one of the highest TFAs ever, I'm sure of it. FAC guidelines do explicitly ask you not to support/oppose in your first few reviews, which is why I was wary. But I do feel like I have a good grasp of the criteria. --Lobo (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Sinking of the RMS Titanic FAC

I'm not sure why you're worried – the article has more supports than I've seen in ages, and I'm certain no delegate will infer an oppose. I'm generally unwilling to support/oppose articles I haven't given a thorough-enough check. Best wishes, Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm not worried, I just wanted to update you. :-) Thanks for your help, anyway. Prioryman (talk) 21:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

I added some comments to the FAC log. Jimknut (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

• Support! Jimknut (talk) 23:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) Prioryman (talk) 23:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

A friendly suggestion, but if you're worried that the size of the review page is getting rather long, utilize the talk page. My initial comments were made there with a link from the review page. We can't cap/collapse sections of the reviews, so the recommended procedure is to move the comments from Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Sinking of the RMS Titanic/archive1 to Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article candidates/Sinking of the RMS Titanic/archive1, leaving behind a link. That way the page is streamlined, but the delegates can read the detailed comments if desired. The reason we can't use templates is that each FAC review page is transcluded from monthly archives once closed. (There's one for promotions and one for non-promotions.) If we used templates, those archives would exceed the transclusion limits, so template usage hasn't been allowed in long time. Imzadi 1979 → 00:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I have just noticed that Sinking of the RMS Titanic won its gold FA star a week ago. Congratulations! You have worked solidly on this article for a long time and stuck by it through the GA and FA processes. Well done! I look forward to seeing it as Featured article on 14 or 15 April. Dolphin (t) 14:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I see you are trying to get the Wreck of the Titanic to featured article status before 15 April which is very commendable. I'm not sure I can add much else as its not my domain and you seem knowledgeable about the subject. I'll keep an eye on its development over the coming weeks and will look to support its promotion at the review stage. Good luck. Stevo1000 (talk) 02:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Not really FA as such, since there probably isn't enough time for that now, but at least FA standard for the anniversary date. Prioryman (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

I concur. Your diligence, openness and patience in the face of pedantic PIAs like me were exemplary and the result most gratifying. Thanks. Rumiton (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, both of you! Prioryman (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Murder of Julia Martha Thomas

This is a note to let the main editors of Murder of Julia Martha Thomas know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 2, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/March 2, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Kate Webster, the killer of Julia Martha Thomas

The murder of Julia Martha Thomas was one of the most notorious crimes in Britain in the late 19th century. Thomas, a widow who lived in Richmond in west London, was killed on 2 March 1879 by Kate Webster, her Irish maid (pictured). Webster dismembered the body, boiled the flesh off the bones, and threw most of it into the River Thames, allegedly offering the fat to neighbours as dripping and lard. Part of Thomas's remains were soon recovered but her severed head was only found in October 2010 during building works being carried out for the naturalist Sir David Attenborough. After the murder, Webster posed as Thomas for two weeks but was exposed and fled to her family home at Killanne, Ireland. She was arrested on 29 March and stood trial in London at the Old Bailey in July 1879, where she was convicted and sentenced to death. She confessed to the murder the night before she was hanged on 29 July at Wandsworth Prison. The case attracted considerable interest from the public and press in Great Britain and Ireland. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Ship's barnstar award

Thanks! Prioryman (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited RMS Titanic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Runic insignia of the Schutzstaffel

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

RMS Titanic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Queenstown and Newfoundland

Wreck of the RMS Titanic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to National Geographic and Newfoundland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Moon sank the Titanic!

• http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/07/uk-titanic-moon-idUSLNE82601520120307

Well, kinda, sorta, maybe. Worth reading, at least. Alarbus (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Interesting! Thanks for the pointer. Prioryman (talk) 09:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar from WikiProject London Transport

I was going to give this later, but now seems appropriate.--DavidCane (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Prioryman (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Fantastic work! --SupernovaExplosion 15:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Prioryman (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

You probably saw this but...

Here is something interesting - and very cool. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Amazing images, aren't they? I added something about it to the article. Thanks for your review, by the way - I look forward to seeing what response it gets on the Main Page! Prioryman (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited Wreck of the RMS Titanic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Fe and Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

Hi Prioryman, as you know (or should have known), you were subject to a topic ban with regards to Climate Change that prohibits participating in any process broadly construed on Misplaced Pages particularly affecting these articles. Your comment on the Cla68 clarification is a violation of that topic ban. I have removed that comment and blocked you for 24 hours. SirFozzie (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Prioryman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hadn't realised (though clearly I should have done) that processes were covered as well. It was an inadvertent error on my part, for which I apologise and accept full responsibility. It won't happen again. Prioryman (talk) 17:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Unblocked, with the blocking admin's consent. See here for more. NW (Talk) 17:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Wreck of the RMS Titanic

A barnstar for you!

Titanic days

Hi, I just wanted you to know that I have jumped on board. I reviewed your DYK (Saved from the Titanic) and added one of my own. If you care to look it is at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Melville Hays‎. Take care, --Ishtar456 (talk) 01:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

IBAN

Per both your agreements I am imposing a binding interaction ban on you and Delicious Carbuncle. Please do not comment on, or otherwise interact with him, at any venue. If you want to appeal the ban for any reason please do so on my talk page (which will be excluded from the ban), or to Arbcom. I hope that satisfies everyone. --Errant 11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)