Misplaced Pages

User talk:DHeyward/derpchive1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:DHeyward

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DHeyward (talk | contribs) at 17:22, 27 March 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:22, 27 March 2012 by DHeyward (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

John's comments regarding MF

    • More helpful than "subpar forever" because it didn't push fringe group POV. I'm hoping the comment gave him some perspective that collaborative editing doesn't mean he always gets his way or article quality is in any way tied to one editors desire. What were you hoping to accomplish by extending this debate? --DHeyward (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
      • In what way is "subpar forever" an instance of him "push fringe group POV"? Have you read the GAR? Do you really think it is only one editor who thinks the article has some serious holes? I was hoping to engender some "collaborative editing" because, to me, your comment really wasn't a good example of that. In order to improve the article beyond its current state we will all have to work together and listen to each other. Are you capable of that? --John (talk) 09:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
We already heard it. General consensus is "no" after hearing years of arguments. It doesn't change. Those that can't edit within that framework should stop trying to edit those articles. This conversation on my talk page is over, BTW. Please take it to the article talk page where I may or may participate. Fair warning that I will consider a reply here to be possible trolling and will simply revert it. --DHeyward (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Hounding

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Meh...that's silly.MONGO 17:44, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
You put out a request for peer review, tag it as conservative and then get upset when people edit it? Begone troll. --DHeyward (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.