Misplaced Pages

User talk:1exec1

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JimWae (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 2 April 2012 (Accessdates: using a bot to change <s>hundreds</s> thousands of accessdate formats counter to WP:DATERET). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:02, 2 April 2012 by JimWae (talk | contribs) (Accessdates: using a bot to change <s>hundreds</s> thousands of accessdate formats counter to WP:DATERET)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:1exec1/rwatch User:1exec1/bin

Not vandalism

Hi! FYI, I changed all start of sentence "agile" to "Agile", that you mistakenly reverted as vandalism, in the article of Agile software development, I wrote the explanation at Talk:Agile software development, and hope you understand. Be happy, don't worry! Rursus dixit. (bork!) 13:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Oops, your edits weren't ones I wanted to revert, sorry for that. But before you there was a series of edit by an IP editor that are almost certainly vandalism. I'll try to fix that. 1exec1 (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Accessdates

WP:MOSNUM specifies that accessdates in YYYY-MM-DD format are acceptable. WP:DATERET specifies that dates in an accepted format should not be changed w/o consensus. You appear to be using a bot to change hundreds thousands of accessdate formats counter to WP:DATERET, with no consensus or even notification of intention.--JimWae (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:1exec1 Add topic