Misplaced Pages

User talk:TipPt

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TipPt (talk | contribs) at 00:23, 16 April 2006 (→"Relevant quotes"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:23, 16 April 2006 by TipPt (talk | contribs) (→"Relevant quotes")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, TipPt. It's nice to see someone interested in improving Circumcision with properly sourced information. But could I ask you to sign your comments? Just type ~~~~ (that's four tilde's, the upper symbol on the key to the left of the #1 key), and Misplaced Pages will automatically sign your user name and the time of your comment to the article. This helps us keep track of who said what, and also makes it easier to leave replies on each others' talk pages so we can work together more effectively. Thanks a lot, and good luck.  :) -Kasreyn 10:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

RFC

Template:RFM-Filed

Alienus 02:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Your comment at Talk:Circumcision

There is no need to shout, nor make unpleasant remarks. If a page needs to be improved, it is not appropriate to leave a message at a different talk page. Instead, explain your concerns at the appropriate talk page, and we can try to address them. I'm more than happy to work with you on this, as I'm sure are other editors, but you must use talk pages for their intended purpose. Jakew 10:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

The whole table is opinion or misleading and needs to be removed.TipPt 15:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Explain why you think so at Talk:Sexual effects of circumcision, and we'll discuss it. Jakew 15:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

"Relevant quotes"

The purpose of the talk pages is to discuss an article and proposed changes to it. It is not to present evidence of perceived wrongdoing, nor to duplicate large sections of earlier discussions. It's not clear what your purpose was in creating the section, but I have moved it to . Please don't bother replying unless you care to do so in good faith. It wastes my time and yours. Jakew 20:12, 15 April 2006 UTC)

You have not operated in good faith.TipPt 00:23, 16 April 2006 (UTC)