This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conti (talk | contribs) at 21:29, 22 May 2004 (removed part). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:29, 22 May 2004 by Conti (talk | contribs) (removed part)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)What is "Zootropic Paranoia" ? Google produces only this article for that term! If it is a term coined within this community, could it be briefly explained please? -- Tarquin
My Oct 6, 2003 change was not minor, sorry
Sorry, I forgot to untick the "minor edit" box. So I'm a noob. I've changed my preferences so it doesn't default to ticked. PeterCat 00:32, Oct 8, 2003 (UTC)
Extensive edit/reorganization
This edit was an extensive reorganization of the article, bringing together related ideas and excising redundant material (and some weasel and non-NPOV language). "See Also" links were incorporated into the text as free links. PeterCat 03:59, Oct 29, 2003 (UTC)
- I would think weasel words would be encouraged on this particular topic --Calieber 18:49, Oct 30, 2003 (UTC)
Is the quote "G*d Damned" accurate or has that censoring been done by the editor who put it in? If so, why is God censored rather than Damned? I'd suggest leaving it as "God Damned" unless the original was also censored. --Darac 14:55, 26 Nov 2003 (UTC)
I removed the sentence "The furry fandom is often depicted as being chiefly female. Given that most furry works, though adult level, tend to be lighter and more sentimental, many see reason to believe that the furry fandom evolved as a reaction to the male dominated testoterone fantasies prevalent the comics/SF/cartoon fandom.". I take part in the furry fandom and don't see significant more "female behaviour" than in any other community. --Conti 21:29, 22 May 2004 (UTC)